Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26149302›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2015

Respective impact of no escalation of treatment, withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment on ICU patients' prognosis: a multicenter study of the Outcomerea Research Group.

Alexandre Lautrette, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas, Pierre-Marie Bertrand, Dany Goldgran-Toledano, Samir Jamali, Virginie Laurent, Laurent Argaud, Carole Schwebel, Bruno Mourvillier, Michaël Darmon and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Selection and Receipt of Kidney Replacement in Critically Ill Older Patients with AKI.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Alexandre LautretteMedical Intensive Care Unit, Gabriel Montpied Teaching Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, 54 rue Montalembert, BP69, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France. alautrette@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
Maïté Garrouste-OrgeasCritical Care Medicine Unit, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
Pierre-Marie BertrandMedical Intensive Care Unit, Gabriel Montpied Teaching Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, 54 rue Montalembert, BP69, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France.
Dany Goldgran-ToledanoCritical Care Medicine Unit, Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France.
Samir JamaliCritical Care Medicine Unit, Dourdan Hospital, Dourdan, France.
Virginie LaurentCritical Care Medicine Unit, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France.
Laurent ArgaudMedical Intensive Care Unit, Edouard Herriot Teaching Hospital, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Carole SchwebelMedical Intensive Care Unit, Albert Michallon Teaching Hospital, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Bruno MourvillierMedical Intensive Care Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Michaël DarmonMedical Intensive Care Unit, Nord Teaching Hospital, University of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Stéphane RucklyU823 "Outcome of cancers and critical illness", Albert Bonniot Institute, 38076, La Tronche, France.
Anne-Sylvie DumenilSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Antoine Beclere University Hospital, Clamart, France.
Virginie LemialeMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Louis Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Bertrand SouweineMedical Intensive Care Unit, Gabriel Montpied Teaching Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, 54 rue Montalembert, BP69, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France.
Jean-François TimsitMedical Intensive Care Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Outcomerea Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the prevalence of decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment (DFLST), the patients characteristics, and to estimate the impact of DFLST stages on mortality.

methodsObservational study of a prospective database between 2005 and 2012 from 13 ICUs. DFLST were defined as follows: no escalation of treatment (stage 1), not to start or escalate treatment even if such treatment is considered in the future; withholding (stage 2), not to start or escalate necessary treatment; withdrawal (stage 3), to stop necessary treatment. The impact of daily DFLST stage on day-30 hospital mortality was tested with a discrete-time Cox's model and adjusted for admission severity and daily SOFA score.

resultsOf 10,080 patients, 1290 (13%) made DFLST. The highest DFLST stage during the ICU stay was no escalation of treatment in 339 (26%) patients, withholding in 502 (39%) patients, and withdrawal in 449 (35%) patients. Older patients, patients with at least one chronic disease, and patients with greater ICU severity were significantly more numerous in the DFLST group. Day-30 mortality was 13% for non-DFLST patients, 35% for no escalation of treatment, 75% for withholding, 93% for withdrawal. After adjustment, an increase in day-30 mortality was associated with withholding and withdrawal (hazard ratio 95% CI 5.93 [4.95-7.12] and 20.05 [15.58-25.79], P < 0.0001), but not with no escalation of treatment (HR 1.14 [0.91-1.44], P = 0.25).

conclusionsDFLST were made in 13% of ICU patients. Withholding, withdrawal, older age, more comorbidities, and higher severity of illness were associated with higher mortality. No escalation of treatment was not associated with increased mortality.

Indexed as

Decision MakingResuscitation OrdersAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansIntensive Care UnitsLife Support CareMaleMiddle AgedMortalityObservational Studies as TopicPrognosisProspective StudiesWithholding TreatmentCritical careDecision-makingDo-not-resuscitateEnd-of-lifePrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.