Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26149119›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2015

Pattern mixture models for the analysis of repeated attempt designs.

Michael J Daniels, Dan Jackson, Wei Feng, Ian R White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Note on Monotonicity in Repeated Attempt Selection Models.Statistics & probability letters · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael J DanielsDepartment of Integrative Biology, Department of Statistics & Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712.
Dan JacksonMedical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, U.K.
Wei FengDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Ian R WhiteMedical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, U.K.

Funding

BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
COVARIANCE ESTIMATION FOR LONGITUDINAL CANCER DATAR01CA085295 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2001 to 2012
$1.1M
Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M025012/1Medical Research Council MC_U105260558Medical Research Council U105260558NCI NIH HHS CA183854NCI NIH HHS CA85295NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085295NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not uncommon in follow-up studies to make multiple attempts to collect a measurement after baseline. Recording whether these attempts are successful or not provides useful information for the purposes of assessing the missing at random (MAR) assumption and facilitating missing not at random (MNAR) modeling. This is because measurements from subjects who provide this data after multiple failed attempts may differ from those who provide the measurement after fewer attempts. This type of "continuum of resistance" to providing a measurement has hitherto been modeled in a selection model framework, where the outcome data is modeled jointly with the success or failure of the attempts given these outcomes. Here, we present a pattern mixture approach to model this type of data. We re-analyze the repeated attempt data from a trial that was previously analyzed using a selection model approach. Our pattern mixture model is more flexible and is more transparent in terms of parameter identifiability than the models that have previously been used to model repeated attempt data and allows for sensitivity analysis. We conclude that our approach to modeling this type of data provides a fully viable alternative to the more established selection model.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBiometryData Interpretation, StatisticalFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchizophreniaNonignorable missingnessRepeated attempt modelSelection modelSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID26149119
PMCPMC4836559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.