Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26149050›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2015

Manipulating megakaryocytes to manufacture platelets ex vivo.

P Karagiannis, K Eto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Cultured platelets].Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. On the Way toFrontiers in medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Towards the Manufacture of Megakaryocytes and Platelets for Clinical Application.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P KaragiannisDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
K EtoDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, platelet transfusion has proven a reliable way to treat patients suffering from thrombocytopenia or similar ailments. An undersupply of donors, however, has demanded alternative platelet sources. Scientists have therefore sought to recapitulate the biological events that convert hematopoietic stem cells into platelets in the laboratory. Such platelets have shown good function and potential for treatment. Yet the number manufactured ex vivo falls well short of clinical application. Part of the reason is the remarkable gaps in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving platelet formation. Using several stem cell sources, scientists have progressively clarified the chemical signaling and physical microenvironment that optimize ex vivo platelets and reconstituted them in synthetic environments. Key advances in cell reprogramming and the ability to propagate self-renewal have extended the lifetime of megakaryocytes to increase the pool of platelet progenitors.

Indexed as

ThrombopoiesisBioreactorsBlood PlateletsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMegakaryocytesPhenotypePlatelet TransfusionStem Cell Nichebioreactorsblood plateletsinduced pluripotent stem cellsmegakaryocytespolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID26149050
PMCPMC4501322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.