Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26148880›Full record

ReviewVaccine2015

In situ vaccination by radiotherapy to improve responses to anti-CTLA-4 treatment.

Claire Vanpouille-Box, Karsten A Pilones, Erik Wennerberg, Silvia C Formenti, Sandra Demaria

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Phase 1/2 Trial of Pembrolizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Limited-Stage SCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Targeting Lysosomes for Enhanced Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Immune Response.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Prospects of Synergy: Local Interventions and CAR T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire Vanpouille-BoxDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, and NYU Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Karsten A PilonesDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, and NYU Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Erik WennerbergDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, and NYU Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Silvia C FormentiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, and NYU Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Sandra DemariaDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, and NYU Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, and NYU Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: sandra.demaria@nyumc.org.
New York University · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
Immunomodulation of breast cancer via TLR7 agonist imiquimod and radiotherapy.R01CA161891 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ADAMS, SYLVIA, FORMENTI, SILVIA C. · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA016087NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161891NCI NIH HHS R01R01CA161891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting immune checkpoint receptors has emerged as an effective strategy to induce immune-mediated cancer regression in the subset of patients who have significant pre-existing anti-tumor immunity. For the remainder, effective anti tumor responses may require vaccination. Radiotherapy, traditionally used to achieve local tumor control, has acquired a new role, that of a partner for immunotherapy. Ionizing radiation has pro-inflammatory effects that facilitate tumor rejection. Radiation alters the tumor to enhance the concentration of effector T cells via induction of chemokines, cytokines and adhesion molecules. In parallel, radiation can induce an immunogenic death of cancer cells, promoting cross-presentation of tumor-derived antigens by dendritic cells to T cells. Newly generated anti-tumor immune responses have been demonstrated post-radiation in both murine models and occasional patients, supporting the hypothesis that the irradiated tumor can become an in situ vaccine. It is in this role, that radiation can be applied to induce anti-tumor T cells in lymphocyte-poor tumors, and possibly benefit patients who would otherwise fail to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data demonstrating that radiation acts in concert with antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), to induce therapeutically effective anti-tumor T cell responses in tumors otherwise non responsive to anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCTLA-4 AntigenDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceNeoplasmsRadiotherapyT-LymphocytesVaccinationCTLA-4 AntigenAbscopal effectImmmune checkpointImmunotherapyRadiation-induced vaccination

Identifiers

PMID26148880
PMCPMC4684480
OpenAlexW818981131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.