Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26148681›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

ComOn Coaching: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of a varied number of coaching sessions on transfer into clinical practice following communication skills training.

Marcelo Niglio de Figueiredo, Bärbel Rudolph, Bärbel Rodolph, Carma L Bylund, Tanja Goelz, Pia Heußner, Heribert Sattel, Kurt Fritzsche, Alexander Wuensch

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing Communication Skills in Real Medical Encounters in Oncology: Development and Validation of the ComOn-Coaching Rating Scales.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcelo Niglio de FigueiredoDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Freiburg University Medical Center, Hauptstr. 8, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany. marcelo.de.figueiredo@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Bärbel Rudolph
Bärbel RodolphDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Langerstr. 3, D-81675, München, Germany. baerbel.rudolph@yahoo.de.
Carma L BylundDepartment of Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation; Doha-Qatar, Weill-Cornell Medical College - Qatar, Doha, Qatar. CLincoln@hmc.org.qa.
Tanja GoelzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Freiburg University Medical Center, Hauptstr. 8, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany. tanja.goelz@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Pia HeußnerDepartment of Haematology and Internal Oncology, Interdisciplinary Psycho-Oncology Center, University Clinic of Munich - Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, München, Germany. Pia.Heussner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Heribert SattelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Langerstr. 3, D-81675, München, Germany. heribert.sattel@metakontor.de.
Kurt FritzscheDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Freiburg University Medical Center, Hauptstr. 8, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany. kurt.fritzsche@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Alexander WuenschDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Langerstr. 3, D-81675, München, Germany. alexander.wuensch@mri.tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication skills training has proven to be an effective means to enhance communication of health care professionals in oncology. These effects are well studied in standardized settings. The question of transferring these skills into clinical consultations remains open. We build up on a previous developed training concept consisting of a workshop and coaching. This training achieved a medium effect size in two studies with standardized patients. In the current study, we expanded and manualized the coaching concept, and we will evaluate effects of a varied number of coaching sessions on real clinical consultations. Our aim is to determine how much coaching oncologists need to transfer communication skills into clinical practice. METHODS/

designPhysicians of two German medical centers will participate in a workshop for communication skills and will be randomized to either a group with one coaching session or a group with four coaching sessions following the workshop. The participation is voluntary and the physicians will receive medical education points. Consultations held by the participating physicians with actual patients who gave their informed consent will be filmed at three time points. These consultations will be evaluated by blinded raters using a checklist based on the training content (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes will be the self-evaluated communication competence by physicians and an evaluation of the consultations by both physicians and patients. DISCUSSION: We will evaluate our communication training concept on three levels - rater, physician and patient - and concentrate on the transfer of communication skills into real life situations. As we emphasize the external validity in this study design, limitations will be expected due to heterogeneity of data. With this study we aim to gain data on how to improve communication skills training that will result in better patient outcomes.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00004385 .

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCommunicationMedical OncologyPhysician-Patient RelationsSocial SkillsHumans

Identifiers

PMID26148681
PMCPMC4494160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.