ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2015
Calibration and Discrimination Among Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Scores in a Modern Multiethnic Cohort.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular risk algorithms in primary care: Results from the DETECT study.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Polygenic risk and incident coronary heart disease in a large multiethnic cohort.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Incorporating longitudinal history of risk factors into atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ceramide Scores Predict Cardiovascular Risk in the Community.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021Article
- Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Personalization of Antihypertensive Therapy: A Pooled Cohort Analysis.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2021Article
- Assessing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk with Advanced Lipid Testing: State of the Science.European cardiology · 2020Review
- Coronary Artery Calcium - From Screening to a Personalized Shared Decision-Making Tool: The New American Prevention Guidelines.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26148287What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.