Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26148202›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Milnacipran for neuropathic pain in adults.

Sheena Derry, Tudor Phillips, R Andrew Moore, Philip J Wiffen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Drug therapy for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Milnacipran for pain in fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Fibromyalgia interventions, obstacles and prospects: narrative review.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. "I'll Be Back": The Resurrection of Dezocine.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheena DerryPain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Tudor Phillips
R Andrew Moore
Philip J Wiffen
Thame Community Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/89/29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMilnacipran is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) that is sometimes used to treat chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. This is an update of an earlier review of milnacipran for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults originally published in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2012. We split that review so that this one looked only at neuropathic pain, and a separate review looks at fibromyalgia.

objectivesTo assess the analgesic efficacy and associated adverse events of milnacipran for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and EMBASE to 23 February 2015, together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind studies of eight weeks' duration or longer, comparing milnacipran with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently searched for studies, extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality. We did not carry out any analysis. MAIN

resultsWe included a single study of 40 participants with chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component. It found no difference in pain scores between milnacipran 100 mg to 200 mg daily or placebo after six weeks (very low quality evidence). Adverse event rates were similar between treatments, with too few data to draw conclusions (very low quality evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere was no evidence to support the use of milnacipran to treat neuropathic pain conditions.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesicsBack PainChronic PainCyclopropanesFibromyalgiaHumansMilnacipranNeuralgiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAnalgesicsCyclopropanesMilnacipranSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26148202
PMCPMC6485877
OpenAlexW1655904958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.