Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26147827›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2016

Recombinant pediocin in Lactococcus lactis: increased production by propeptide fusion and improved potency by co-production with PedC.

Alexandre Back, Frédéric Borges, Cécile Mangavel, Cédric Paris, Emmanuel Rondags, Romain Kapel, Arnaud Aymes, Hélène Rogniaux, Marija Pavlović, Auke J van Heel and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre BackLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules (LIBio), ENSAIA, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Frédéric BorgesLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules (LIBio), ENSAIA, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Cécile MangavelLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules (LIBio), ENSAIA, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Cédric ParisLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules (LIBio), ENSAIA, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Emmanuel RondagsLaboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés (LRGP), CNRS-UMR 7274, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Romain KapelLaboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés (LRGP), CNRS-UMR 7274, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Arnaud AymesLaboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés (LRGP), CNRS-UMR 7274, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Hélène RogniauxINRA Unité Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages (UR1268), Rue de la Géraudière, Nantes, 44316, France.
Marija PavlovićINRA Unité Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages (UR1268), Rue de la Géraudière, Nantes, 44316, France.
Auke J van HeelDepartment of Molecular Genetics, GBB Institute, University of Gronningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Oscar P KuipersDepartment of Molecular Genetics, GBB Institute, University of Gronningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anne-Marie Revol-JunellesLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules (LIBio), ENSAIA, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Catherine Cailliez-GrimalLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules (LIBio), ENSAIA, Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54518, France.
Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des BiomoléculesCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRBiopolymères Interactions Assemblages · FRUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the impact of two propeptides and PedC on the production yield and the potency of recombinant pediocins produced in Lactococcus lactis. On the one hand, the sequences encoding the propeptides SD or LEISSTCDA were inserted between the sequence encoding the signal peptide of Usp45 and the structural gene of the mature pediocin PA-1. On the other hand, the putative thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase PedC was coexpressed with pediocin. The concentration of recombinant pediocins produced in supernatants was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The potency of recombinant pediocins was investigated by measuring the minimal inhibitory concentration by agar well diffusion assay. The results show that propeptides SD or LEISSTCDA lead to an improved secretion of recombinant pediocins with apparently no effect on the antibacterial potency and that PedC increases the potency of recombinant pediocin. To our knowledge, this study reveals for the first time that pediocin tolerates fusions at the N-terminal end. Furthermore, it reveals that only expressing the pediocin structural gene in a heterologous host is not sufficient to get an optimal potency and requires the accessory protein PedC. In addition, it can be speculated that PedC catalyses the correct formation of disulfide bonds in pediocin.

Indexed as

Metabolic EngineeringEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayLactococcus lactisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPediocinsRecombinant ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNAPediocinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26147827
PMCPMC4919988
OpenAlexW2099601488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.