Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26147658›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Susceptibility of Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) to Monkeypox Virus: A Low Dose Prospective Model for Monkeypox and Smallpox Disease.

Eric M Mucker, Jennifer Chapman, Louis M Huzella, John W Huggins, Joshua Shamblin, Camenzind G Robinson, Lisa E Hensley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Marmosets as models of infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Zoonotic and Zooanthroponotic Potential of Monkeypox.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. iScience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric M MuckerVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America; Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisianna, United States of America.
Jennifer ChapmanJoint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Louis M HuzellaIntegrated Research Facility, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America.
John W HugginsVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America.
Joshua ShamblinVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America.
Camenzind G RobinsonPathology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America.
Lisa E HensleyIntegrated Research Facility, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, United States of America.
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USTulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although current nonhuman primate models of monkeypox and smallpox diseases provide some insight into disease pathogenesis, they require a high titer inoculum, use an unnatural route of infection, and/or do not accurately represent the entire disease course. This is a concern when developing smallpox and/or monkeypox countermeasures or trying to understand host pathogen relationships. In our studies, we altered half of the test system by using a New World nonhuman primate host, the common marmoset. Based on dose finding studies, we found that marmosets are susceptible to monkeypox virus infection, produce a high viremia, and have pathological features consistent with smallpox and monkeypox in humans. The low dose (48 plaque forming units) required to elicit a uniformly lethal disease and the extended incubation (preclinical signs) are unique features among nonhuman primate models utilizing monkeypox virus. The uniform lethality, hemorrhagic rash, high viremia, decrease in platelets, pathology, and abbreviated acute phase are reflective of early-type hemorrhagic smallpox.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityModels, BiologicalAnimalsCallithrixChlorocebus aethiopsMaleMonkeypox virusMpox, MonkeypoxProspective StudiesVariola virusVero CellsViral Load

Identifiers

PMID26147658
PMCPMC4492619
OpenAlexW802906653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.