Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26147381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Maternal Vitamin D Status and Its Related Factors in Pregnant Women in Bangkok, Thailand.

Busadee Pratumvinit, Preechaya Wongkrajang, Tuangsit Wataganara, Sithikan Hanyongyuth, Akarin Nimmannit, Somruedee Chatsiricharoenkul, Kotchamol Manonukul, Kanit Reesukumal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Regimens of vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Busadee PratumvinitDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Preechaya WongkrajangDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tuangsit WataganaraDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sithikan HanyongyuthDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Akarin NimmannitOffice for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somruedee ChatsiricharoenkulDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kotchamol ManonukulDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanit ReesukumalDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few data focusing on the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in tropical countries.

objectivesWe determined the vitamin D status in pregnant women and examined the factors associated with vitamin D deficiency. DESIGN AND

methodsA cross-sectional study of 147 pregnant Thai women aged 18-45 years at Siriraj Hospital (a university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand) was undertaken. Clinical data and plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium, albumin, phosphate and magnesium were obtained in pregnant women at delivery.

resultsThe prevalence of hypovitaminosis D [defined as 25(OH)D <75 nmol/L] in pregnant women at delivery was 75.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 67.7-82.2%). Of these, vitamin D insufficiency [defined as 25(OH)D 50-74.9 nmol/L] was found in 41.5% (95% CI, 33.4-49.9%) and vitamin D deficiency [25(OH)D <50 nmol/L] was found in 34.0% (95% CI, 26.4-42.3%) of women. The mean 25(OH)D concentration was 61.6 ± 19.3 nmol/L. The correlation between 25(OH)D and iPTH was weak (r = -0.29, P<0.01). Factors associated with vitamin D deficiency by multiple logistic regression were: pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI in kg/m2, odds ratio (OR), 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97, P = 0.01) and season of blood collection (winter vs. rainy, OR, 2.62, 95% CI 1.18-5.85, P = 0.02).

conclusionsVitamin D deficiency is common among pregnant Thai women. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency increased in women who had a lower pre-pregnancy BMI and whose blood was collected in the winter. Vitamin D supplementation may need to be implemented as routine antenatal care.

Indexed as

AdultBody Mass IndexCalciumChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMagnesiumMiddle AgedParathyroid HormonePhosphatesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalenceRisk Factors25-hydroxyvitamin DCalciumMagnesiumParathyroid HormonePhosphatesSerum AlbuminVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID26147381
PMCPMC4492949
OpenAlexW297414087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.