Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26147367›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2015

Talking About Quitting: Interpersonal Communication as a Mediator of Campaign Effects on Smokers' Quit Behaviors.

Michelle Jeong, Andy S L Tan, Emily Brennan, Laura Gibson, Robert C Hornik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle Jeonga Annenberg School for Communication , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Andy S L Tana Annenberg School for Communication , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Emily Brennana Annenberg School for Communication , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Laura Gibsona Annenberg School for Communication , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Robert C Hornika Annenberg School for Communication , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.

Funding

UPENN TCORS: Tobacco Product Messaging in a Complex Communication EnvironmentP50CA179546 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C., LERMAN, CARYN · 2013 to 2017
$18.7M
CATEGORY B: COMMUNITIES PUTTING PREVENTION TO WORKU58DP002633 · DP · PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MALLYA, GIRIDHAR · 2010 to 2010
$10.4M
Effects of Public Information in Cancer (EPIC Center)P50CA095856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C. · 2003 to 2007
$10.1M
Training / Career DevelopmentP20CA095856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C. · 2008 to 2012
$8.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1U58DP002633-01NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP002633NCI NIH HHS P20 CA095856NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095856NCI NIH HHS P50CA095856NCI NIH HHS P50 CA179546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the role of interpersonal communication in the context of a mass media anti-smoking campaign. Specifically, it explored whether conversations about campaign ads and/or about quitting mediated campaign exposure effects on 2 quitting behaviors (sought help to quit and tried to quit smoking completely), as well as the relation between ad-related and quitting-related conversations. Data were collected before the campaign and monthly for 16 months during the campaign through cross-sectional telephone surveys among a sample of 3,277 adult Philadelphia smokers. Follow-up interviews were conducted among 877 participants 3 months after their first survey. Cross-sectional and longitudinal mediation models with bootstrap procedures assessed the indirect effects of campaign exposure on outcomes through conversations, and the indirect effects of conversations about ads on outcomes through conversations about quitting. In addition, lagged regression analyses tested the causal direction of associations between the variables of interest. The results partially support hypotheses that conversations about quitting mediate campaign effects on quitting-related behaviors and, in line with previous research, that conversations about the ads have indirect effects on quitting-related behaviors by triggering conversations about quitting. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering interpersonal communication as a route of campaign exposure effects when evaluating and designing future public health campaigns.

Indexed as

AdvertisingCommunicationInterpersonal RelationsSmoking PreventionAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumansMaleMass MediaMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID26147367
PMCPMC4703310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.