Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26147343›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

PARADISE 24: A Measure to Assess the Impact of Brain Disorders on People's Lives.

Alarcos Cieza, Carla Sabariego, Marta Anczewska, Carolina Ballert, Jerome Bickenbach, Maria Cabello, Ambra Giovannetti, Teemu Kaskela, Blanca Mellor, Tuuli Pitkänen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method-based consensus guideline.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of PARADISE 24 and Development of PARADISE-EDEN 36 in Patients with Dementia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges in Documenting Non-Fatal Drowning Disability in Bangladesh: A Community-Based Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Psychosocial difficulties in patients with episodic migraine: a cross-sectional study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Alarcos CiezaFaculty of Social and Human Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Carla SabariegoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Marta AnczewskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Carolina BallertSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Jerome BickenbachSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Maria CabelloInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Psychiatry Service, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ambra GiovannettiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Scientific Directorate, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Teemu KaskelaA-Clinic Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.
Blanca MellorInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Psychiatry Service, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Tuuli PitkänenA-Clinic Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.
Rui QuintasNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Scientific Directorate, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Alberto RaggiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Scientific Directorate, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Piotr ŚwitajDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Somnath ChatterjiMulti-Country Studies, Department of Measurement and Health Information Systems, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
PARADISE Consortium
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology · PLLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERehabilitation Foundation · FISwiss Paraplegic Research · CHWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct a metric of the impact of brain disorders on people's lives, based on the psychosocial difficulties (PSDs) that are experienced in common across brain disorders. STUDY

designPsychometric study using data from a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 722 persons with 9 different brain disorders interviewed in four European countries: Italy, Poland, Spain and Finland. Questions addressing 64 PSDs were first reduced based on statistical considerations, patient's perspective and clinical expertise. Rasch analyses for polytomous data were also applied.

settingIn and outpatient settings.

resultsA valid and reliable metric with 24 items was created. The infit of all questions ranged between 0.7 and 1.3. There were no disordered thresholds. The targeting between item thresholds and persons' abilities was good and the person-separation index was 0.92. Persons' abilities were linearly transformed into a more intuitive scale ranging from zero (no PSDs) to 100 (extreme PSDs).

conclusionThe metric, called PARADISE 24, is based on the hypothesis of horizontal epidemiology, which affirms that people with brain disorders commonly experience PSDs. This metric is a useful tool to carry out cardinal comparisons over time of the magnitude of the psychosocial impact of brain disorders and between persons and groups in clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultBrain DiseasesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychology

Identifiers

PMID26147343
PMCPMC4492620
OpenAlexW1749021106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.