Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2015
Echocardiographic Detection of Cardiac Dysfunction in Childhood Cancer Survivors: How Long Is Screening Required?
Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building a machine learning-assisted echocardiography prediction tool for children at risk for cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen.Journal of drug assessment · 2022Article
- Progress Toward Improving Recommended Screening Practices in Survivors of Childhood Cancer at Risk for Cardiomyopathy.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
- Challenges in Implementing Optimal Echocardiographic Screening in Cardio-Oncology.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Erratum: Correction to Ramjaun A, AlDuhaiby E, Ahmed S, et al.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2017Article
- Echocardiography and Alternative Cardiac Imaging Strategies for Long-Term Cardiotoxicity Surveillance of Cancer Survivors Treated with Chemotherapy and/or Radiation Exposure.Current oncology reports · 2016Review
- Cardiomyopathy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Lessons from the Past and Challenges for the Future.Current oncology reports · 2016Review
- Can ErbB2 overexpression protect against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity?American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood cancer survivors treated with anthracycline chemotherapy are at an increased risk of long-term cardiac toxicity, and guidelines recommend that exposed survivors undergo echocardiography every 1-5 years. However, it is unclear whether survivors should undergo echocardiographic screening indefinitely, or if a period of echocardiographic stability indicates that screening is no longer necessary. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of echocardiographic screening to aid in the refinement of existing guidelines.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the results of echocardiographic screening in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood cancer treated with anthracyclines and/or cardiac radiation therapy. Interval regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of single-episode or sustained abnormal echocardiograms.
resultsThe cohort constituted 333 survivors, with median follow-up time of 15.8 years post-treatment (range: 5.0-47.9), and median age at treatment of 8 years (range: 1.5-18). Forty-nine survivors had an abnormal echocardiogram (14.7%), and 29 (8.7%) had reproducible abnormal findings. An ongoing continual increase in the incidence of sustained echocardiographic abnormality was seen among patients treated with >250 mg/m(2) doxorubicin at age <5 years, reaching 43% by 20 years of therapy. In contrast, no sustained abnormal echocardiographic findings arose after 10 years of therapy in survivors treated with <250 mg/m(2) at age ≥5 years.
conclusionsSingle-episode echocardiographic abnormalities are often not reproduced in subsequent evaluations. The duration of echocardiographic screening for childhood cancer survivors should be reassessed for patients who received lower doses of anthracycline after age 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.