Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26146829›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

The Screening Performance of Serum 1,3-Beta-D-Glucan in Patients with Invasive Fungal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Tie-Ying Hou, Shou-Hong Wang, Sui-Xin Liang, Wen-Xin Jiang, Dan-Dong Luo, De-Hong Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of the DynamikerInfectious diseases and therapy · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomarkers of fungal infection: Expert opinion on the current situation.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tie-Ying HouMedical Department of HAI Control, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510080, China.
Shou-Hong WangIntensive Care Unit, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510080, China.
Sui-Xin LiangIntensive Care Unit, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510080, China.
Wen-Xin JiangNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510080, China.
Dan-Dong LuoCardiac Surgery intensive care unit, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510080, China.
De-Hong HuangGuangzhou Hospital of TCM, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, 510130, China.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serum 1,3-beta-D-glucan (BG) assay aids in the early diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) and has been approved for their diagnosis. However, reports on the screening performance of BG are scarce. We performed a meta-analysis of data extracted from only prospective cohort studies to evaluate the screening performance of the BG assay in the diagnosis of IFDs. We specifically searched 4 databases (the PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, and Cochrane Collaboration databases) according to EORTC-MSG criteria. A total of 1068 patients in 11 studies were analyzed. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test suggested a low likelihood of publication bias for the included studies (p = 0.055). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.75(0.63,0.84), 0.87(0.81,0.92), 5.85(3.96,8.63), 0.30(0.20,0.45), 19.53(11.16,34.18), and 0.89(0.86,0.91), respectively. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the BG assay is a useful screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between patients with and without IFDs. In clinical practice, BG assay results should be evaluated together with clinical and microbiological findings.

Indexed as

beta-GlucansHumansMycosesProspective StudiesSensitivity and Specificitybeta-1,3-glucanbeta-Glucans

Identifiers

PMID26146829
PMCPMC4493111
OpenAlexW2336563405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.