Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26146807›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2015

Hematopoietic stem cell donation: psychological perspectives of pediatric sibling donors and their parents.

D Hutt, M Nehari, D Munitz-Shenkar, Y Alkalay, A Toren, B Bielorai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Growth in the face of overwhelming pressure: A narrative review of sibling donor experiences in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Closure.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Discussing and managing hematologic germ line variants.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D HuttDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and BMT, Edmond and Lily Safra Children Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
M NehariDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and BMT, Edmond and Lily Safra Children Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
D Munitz-ShenkarDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and BMT, Edmond and Lily Safra Children Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Y AlkalaySocial Sciences Faculty, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
A TorenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and BMT, Edmond and Lily Safra Children Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
B BieloraiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and BMT, Edmond and Lily Safra Children Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is widely used for treatment of various life-threatening pediatric diseases. It is an intensive process that psychologically affects the whole family. Pediatric donors represent a very unique, underreported, group. The aim of this study is to investigate the sibling donors' and their parents' perspective on the donation process. The cohort included 36 sibling donors and 50 parents of pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic SCT between 1995 and 2010 and were alive at the time of the study. Mean age at donation was 14.78±8.350 years in donors' group and 8.22±4.639 years in parents' group. Data were collected by anonymous questionnaires. Three psychological dimensions were analyzed: donors' personal perspective; donor-recipient interpersonal relationship and the influence of the donation on the family unit. Results showed that the donors experienced a wide range of complex emotional responses, positive and negative, whereas the parents' responses were mainly positive and less complex. This study presents both the sibling donor's and parents' perspective, giving a more complete picture of the donation process within the family. The effects of this intense experience of SCT has a long-term impact on the whole family, indicating the need for follow-up and psychosocial support.

Indexed as

AdolescentCohort StudiesFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLiving DonorsMaleParentsSiblingsSurveys and QuestionnairesTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID26146807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.