Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26143922›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2015

Structural and biochemical analyses of a Clostridium perfringens sortase D transpeptidase.

Randy Suryadinata, Shane A Seabrook, Timothy E Adams, Stewart D Nuttall, Thomas S Peat

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A comprehensive in silico analysis of sortase superfamily.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2019
    Article
  5. Pilus biogenesis of Gram-positive bacteria: Roles of sortases and implications for assembly.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Review
  6. Sortase Transpeptidases: Structural Biology and Catalytic Mechanism.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structural Insights into Substrate Recognition byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Randy SuryadinataManufacturing Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 343 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Shane A SeabrookManufacturing Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 343 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Timothy E AdamsManufacturing Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 343 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Stewart D NuttallManufacturing Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 343 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Thomas S PeatManufacturing Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 343 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assembly and anchorage of various pathogenic proteins on the surface of Gram-positive bacteria is mediated by the sortase family of enzymes. These cysteine transpeptidases catalyze a unique sorting signal motif located at the C-terminus of their target substrate and promote the covalent attachment of these proteins onto an amino nucleophile located on another protein or on the bacterial cell wall. Each of the six distinct classes of sortases displays a unique biological role, with sequential activation of multiple sortases often observed in many Gram-positive bacteria to decorate their peptidoglycans. Less is known about the members of the class D family of sortases (SrtD), but they have a suggested role in spore formation in an oxygen-limiting environment. Here, the crystal structure of the SrtD enzyme from Clostridium perfringens was determined at 1.99 Å resolution. Comparative analysis of the C. perfringens SrtD structure reveals the typical eight-stranded β-barrel fold observed in all other known sortases, along with the conserved catalytic triad consisting of cysteine, histidine and arginine residues. Biochemical approaches further reveal the specifics of the SrtD catalytic activity in vitro, with a significant preference for the LPQTGS sorting motif. Additionally, the catalytic activity of SrtD is most efficient at 316 K and can be further improved in the presence of magnesium cations. Since C. perfringens spores are heat-resistant and lead to foodborne illnesses, characterization of the spore-promoting sortase SrtD may lead to the development of new antimicrobial agents.

Indexed as

AminoacyltransferasesBacterial ProteinsClostridium perfringensCrystallography, X-RayCysteine EndopeptidasesDynamic Light ScatteringMetalsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationAminoacyltransferasesBacterial ProteinsCysteine EndopeptidasesMetalssortase DLPQTGS sorting motifsortase Dspore-forming Gram-positive bacterium

Identifiers

PMID26143922
PMCPMC4498605
OpenAlexW1670169060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.