Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26143516›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical education

Surgery and Medicine Residents' Perspectives of Morbidity and Mortality Conference: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improve ACGME Core Competency Compliance.

Katherine T Flynn-O'Brien, Samuel P Mandell, Erik Van Eaton, Anneliese M Schleyer, Lisa K McIntyre

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Morbidity and Mortality Conference: A Century-Old Practice with Ongoing Potential for Future Improvement.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Content of a weekly morbidity and mortality conference in visceral surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine T Flynn-O'BrienDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: flynnobr@uw.edu.
Samuel P MandellDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Erik Van EatonDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Anneliese M SchleyerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Lisa K McIntyreDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Harborview Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Pediatric Injury Research Training ProgramT32HD057822 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CAROLYN A MC CARTY, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar · 2010 to 2026
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMorbidity and mortality conferences (MMCs) are often used to fulfill the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) competency, but there is variation among institutions and disciplines in their approach to MMCs. The objective of this study is to examine the trainees' perspective and experience with MMCs and adverse patient event (APE) reporting across disciplines to help guide the future implementation of an institution-wide, workflow-embedded, quality improvement (QI) program for PBLI.

designBetween April 1, 2013, and May 8, 2013, surgical and medical residents were given a confidential survey about APE reporting practices and experience with and attitudes toward MMCs and other QI/patient safety initiatives. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses using the chi-square test for independence were calculated for all variables. Logistic regression and ordered logistic regression were used for nominal and ordinal categorical dependent variables, respectively, to calculate odds of reporting APEs. Qualitative content analysis was used to code free-text responses.

settingA large, multihospital, tertiary academic training program in the Pacific Northwest.

participantsResidents in all years of training from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs in surgery and internal medicine.

resultsSurvey response rate was 46.2% (126/273). Although most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that knowledge of and involvement in QI/patient safety activities was important to their training (88.1%) and future career (91.3%), only 10.3% regularly or frequently reported APEs to the institution's established electronic incident reporting system. Senior-level residents in both surgery and medicine were more likely to report APEs than more junior-level residents were (odds ratio = 4.8, 95% CI: 3.1-7.5). Surgery residents had a 4.9 (95% CI: 2.3-10.5) times higher odds than medicine residents had to have reported an APE to their MMC or service, and a 2.5 (95% CI: 1.0-6.2) times higher odds to have ever reported an APE through any mechanism. The most commonly cited reason for not reporting APEs was "finding the reporting process cumbersome." Overall, 87% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that MMCs were valuable, educational, and contributed to improving patient outcomes, but many cited opportunities for improvement.

conclusionsAlthough the perceived value of MMCs is high among both surgical and medicine trainees, there is significant variability across disciplines and level of training in APE reporting and experience with MMCs. This study presents a multidisciplinary resident perspective on optimizing APE reporting, MMCs, and PBLI compliance.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyAccreditationCongresses as TopicGeneral SurgeryInterdisciplinary CommunicationMorbidityMortalitycompetency-based educationgraduate medical educationmorbiditymortalityPatient Carepatient safetyPractice-Based Learning and Improvementquality improvementSystems-Based Practice

Identifiers

PMID26143516
PMCPMC12679269
OpenAlexW2182499209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.