Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26143348›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

A three-point time series study of antibiotic usage on an intensive care unit, following an antibiotic stewardship programme, after an outbreak of multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

S Singh, Y Z Zhang, S Chalkley, K Ananthan, E Demertzi, M Beach, M Cohen, V Grover, C Chung, J Tatlock and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S SinghIntensive Care Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Imperial College, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK, suveer.singh@imperial.ac.uk.
Y Z Zhang
S Chalkley
K Ananthan
E Demertzi
M Beach
M Cohen
V Grover
C Chung
J Tatlock
N Soni
B Azadian
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBImperial Valley College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic use in intensive care units (ICUs) can promote antimicrobial resistance. Outbreaks of multi-resistant bacteria significantly affect patient outcomes and delivery of care. Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs), combining root-cause analyses and multi-faceted prevention strategies, are necessary, often at significant cost and time. Which elements of such strategies have the largest impact on antibiotic usage following an outbreak is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate how antibiotic usage in a university hospital ICU changed with a non-protocolised ASP following a disruptive outbreak of multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB). This was a three time-period observational cohort study. The primary endpoint was the change in overall antibiotic usage (daily defined dose, DDD, antibiotic-days, antibiotic-courses) for consecutive ICU patients staying >48 h, over three 6-month study time periods pre-MRAB (2008, n = 84) and post-MRAB (2010, n = 88; 2012, n = 122). Secondary endpoints were changes in antibiotic usage and patient demographics, in predefined admission categories (Medical Emergency, ME; Surgical Elective, SEL; and Surgical Emergency, SE). The mean age (54.6 ± 17.7, 58.1 ± 17.9, 62.8 ± 19.1 years*) and severity of illness (APACHE 14.8 ± 8.0, 16.7 ± 6.8, 18.3 ± 6.1*) increased, particularly medical admissions. There was a sustained reduction in DDD antibiotic usage [1895.1 (2008), 1224.2 (2010), 1236.6 (2012) per 1000 patient-days] but no overall change in antibiotic-days or antibiotic-courses. Antibiotic usage (antibiotic-days) fell significantly in surgical emergency admissions [20.2 ± 32.1, 4.6 ± 7.4*, 5.9 ± 7.3]. There was a sustained drop in beta-lactam, quinolone, glycopeptide and macrolide usage. Following an MRAB outbreak, and subsequent operational changes including enhanced ASPs (non-protocolised), there was a sustained overall fall in antibiotic usage in spite of an increase in disease severity over 5 years.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesDisease OutbreaksDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26143348
OpenAlexW851008298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.