Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26143269›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2015

Current Management and Treatment Modalities for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors.

Rupa G Juthani, Mark H Bilsky, Michael A Vogelbaum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Minimally invasive approaches to intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Spinal ependymal tumors.Neuro-oncology advances · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Malignant Spinal Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recurrence of cervical intramedullary gliofibroma.Spinal cord series and cases · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review of the History of Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rupa G JuthaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Mark H Bilsky
Michael A Vogelbaum
Cleveland Clinic · USPresbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementIntramedullary spinal cord tumors are rare central nervous system tumors with unique challenges due to the eloquence of the surrounding tissue. Their treatment and prognosis is largely dependent on tumor histology and patient functionality. The introduction and advancement of microsurgical techniques have made surgery the mainstay of treatment for intramedullary tumors. Tumors that are well demarcated (e.g., ependymomas, hemangioblastomas) can be resected for cure, while more infiltrative tumors (e.g., high-grade astrocytomas) are typically managed with biopsies or limited resections in order to minimize the significant risk of damage to the spinal cord. The use of more aggressive surgical resection for astrocytoma is controversial but may have an increasing role in select cases. The use of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring and intraoperative ultrasound may help guide the extent of surgery while minimizing damage to normal tissue. Advances in MRI technology have greatly aided the diagnosis and preoperative planning of intramedullary tumors. Further advances in intraoperative MRI may make this a useful tool in guiding extent of resection. Preoperative functional status is the most important predictor of neurologic outcome, while histology and extent of resection are the most important predictors of progression-free survival. The use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy is dependent on patient age and histology but is largely reserved for high-grade tumor histologies or systemic involvement. Children are particularly at risk of radiation-induced injury, and these cases may benefit from more focused stereotactic radiation where necessary. Further studies are needed to support new surgical strategies minimizing destabilization and to investigate new forms of adjuvant therapy to minimize toxicity.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementHumansPrognosisSpinal Cord Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26143269
OpenAlexW808818734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.