Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26143255›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2015

DNA Methylation within Transcribed Regions.

Taiko K To, Hidetoshi Saze, Tetsuji Kakutani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Barley somatic embryogenesis-an attempt to modify variation induced in tissue culture.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Epigenetic diversity of3 Biotech · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taiko K ToDepartment of Integrated Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan (T.K.T., T.K.); andOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0412, Japan (H.S.).
Hidetoshi SazeDepartment of Integrated Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan (T.K.T., T.K.); andOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0412, Japan (H.S.).
Tetsuji KakutaniDepartment of Integrated Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan (T.K.T., T.K.); andOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0412, Japan (H.S.) tkakutan@lab.nig.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation within transcribed genes is commonly found in diverse animals and plants. Here, we provide an overview of recent advances and the remaining mystery regarding intragenic DNA methylation.

Indexed as

DNA, IntergenicDNA MethylationDNA, PlantPlantsDNA, IntergenicDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID26143255
PMCPMC4528756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.