Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26142878›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2016

mtDNA analysis of 174 Eurasian populations using a new iterative rank correlation method.

Zoltán Juhász, Tibor Fehér, Endre Németh, Horolma Pamjav

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zoltán JuhászDepartment of Complex Systems, Research Centre for Natural Sciences of the HAS, Budapest, Hungary.
Tibor FehérDNA Laboratory, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Network of Forensic Science Institutes, PO Box. 216, Budapest, 1536, Hungary.
Endre NémethDNA Laboratory, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Network of Forensic Science Institutes, PO Box. 216, Budapest, 1536, Hungary.
Horolma PamjavDNA Laboratory, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Network of Forensic Science Institutes, PO Box. 216, Budapest, 1536, Hungary. phorolma@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we analyse 27-dimensional mtDNA haplogroup distributions of 174 Eurasian, North-African and American populations, including numerous ancient data as well. The main contribution of this work was the description of the haplogroup distribution of recent and ancient populations as compounds of certain hypothetic ancient core populations immediately or indirectly determining the migration processes in Eurasia for a long time. To identify these core populations, we developed a new iterative algorithm determining clusters of the 27 mtDNA haplogroups studied having strong rank correlation among each other within a definite subset of the populations. Based on this study, the current Eurasian populations can be considered as compounds of three early core populations regarding to maternal lineages. We wanted to show that a simultaneous analysis of ancient and recent data using a new iterative rank correlation algorithm and the weighted SOC learning technique may reveal the most important and deterministic migration processes in the past. This technique allowed us to determine geographically, historically and linguistically well-interpretable clusters of our dataset having a very specific, hardly classifiable structure. The method was validated using a 2-dimensional stepping stone model.

Indexed as

DNA, MitochondrialEthnicityGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHumansMitochondriaPhylogenyDNA, MitochondrialA new iterative algorithmData miningEurasian populationsHuman demographic historymtDNA haplogroupsRank correlation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.