Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26142423›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

A system to build distributed multivariate models and manage disparate data sharing policies: implementation in the scalable national network for effectiveness research.

Daniella Meeker, Xiaoqian Jiang, Michael E Matheny, Claudiu Farcas, Michel D'Arcy, Laura Pearlman, Lavanya Nookala, Michele E Day, Katherine K Kim, Hyeoneui Kim and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Trends in biomedical informatics: automated topic analysis of JAMIA articles.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Daniella MeekerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina Del Rey, CA dmeeker@usc.edu.
Xiaoqian JiangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Michael E MathenyGeriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Care Service Department of Biomedical Informatics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Biostatistics.
Claudiu FarcasDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Michel D'ArcyInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina Del Rey, CA.
Laura PearlmanInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina Del Rey, CA.
Lavanya NookalaGeriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Care Service.
Michele E DayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Katherine K KimDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Hyeoneui KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Aziz BoxwalaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Robert El-KarehDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Grace M KuoSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego.
Frederic S ResnicLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Carl KesselmanInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina Del Rey, CA.
Lucila Ohno-MachadoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

Funding

San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000100 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2012 to 2015
$19.7M
iDASH: Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization, and SharingU54HL108460 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2010 to 2015
$19.1M
SCANNER: Scalable National Network for Effectiveness ResearchR01HS019913 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2010 to 2010
$8.3M
Protection of Records: Privacy (PReP) Technology for Medical ResearchR00LM011392 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2013 to 2015
$650k
Protect Privacy of Healthcare Data in the CloudR21LM012060 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2014 to 2015
$376k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019913AHRQ HHS R01HS019913NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000100NHLBI NIH HHS U54HL108460NLM NIH HHS R00 LM011392NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentralized and federated models for sharing data in research networks currently exist. To build multivariate data analysis for centralized networks, transfer of patient-level data to a central computation resource is necessary. The authors implemented distributed multivariate models for federated networks in which patient-level data is kept at each site and data exchange policies are managed in a study-centric manner.

objectiveThe objective was to implement infrastructure that supports the functionality of some existing research networks (e.g., cohort discovery, workflow management, and estimation of multivariate analytic models on centralized data) while adding additional important new features, such as algorithms for distributed iterative multivariate models, a graphical interface for multivariate model specification, synchronous and asynchronous response to network queries, investigator-initiated studies, and study-based control of staff, protocols, and data sharing policies. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on the requirements gathered from statisticians, administrators, and investigators from multiple institutions, the authors developed infrastructure and tools to support multisite comparative effectiveness studies using web services for multivariate statistical estimation in the SCANNER federated network.

resultsThe authors implemented massively parallel (map-reduce) computation methods and a new policy management system to enable each study initiated by network participants to define the ways in which data may be processed, managed, queried, and shared. The authors illustrated the use of these systems among institutions with highly different policies and operating under different state laws. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionFederated research networks need not limit distributed query functionality to count queries, cohort discovery, or independently estimated analytic models. Multivariate analyses can be efficiently and securely conducted without patient-level data transport, allowing institutions with strict local data storage requirements to participate in sophisticated analyses based on federated research networks.

Indexed as

Computer Communication NetworksInformation DisseminationModels, StatisticalSoftwareBiomedical ResearchComparative Effectiveness ResearchDatabases as TopicInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetMultivariate Analysiscomparative effectiveness researchdistributed analyticsfederated research networkprivacy-preserving network infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID26142423
PMCPMC4639714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.