ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2003
A Survey of Clinical Supervision in Genetic Counseling.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- The state of genetic counseling supervision worldwide: Challenges, practices, and pathways for the future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Applying and assessing the PEERS model on genetic counseling training in China: A mixed-method approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Relieving the Bottleneck: An Investigation of Barriers to Expansion of Supervision Networks at Genetic Counseling Training Programs.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- The Relationship between the Supervision Role and Compassion Fatigue and Burnout in Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Measuring the Effectiveness of a Genetic Counseling Supervision Training Conference.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Effects of Anxiety on Novice Genetic Counseling Students' Experience of Supervised Clinical Rotations.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Genetic Counseling Supervisors' Self-Efficacy for Select Clinical Supervision Competencies.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Form Follows Function: A Model for Clinical Supervision of Genetic Counseling Students.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- The impact of supervision training on genetic counselor supervisory identity development.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Barriers impacting the utilization of supervision techniques in genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- The effects of a genetic counseling educational program on hereditary breast cancer for korean healthcare providers.Journal of breast cancer · 2013Article
- Genetic counseling supervisor competencies: results of a Delphi study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- Effects of second language usage on genetic counseling training and supervision.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- Peer Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE): a Canadian experience with peer supervision for genetic counselors.Journal of genetic counseling · 2011Article
- Boundary issues and multiple relationships in genetic counseling supervision: supervisor, non-supervisor, and student perspectives.Journal of genetic counseling · 2011Article
- Training the Millennial learner through experiential evolutionary scaffolding: implications for clinical supervision in graduate education programs.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
- An investigation of genetic counselor experiences in peer group supervision.Journal of genetic counseling · 2008Article
- Games in clinical genetic counseling supervision.Journal of genetic counseling · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three hundred and thirty-five full members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors completed a survey concerning the nature of clinical supervision for genetic counseling students. Slightly over half (54.3%, n = 182) had provided clinical supervision within the past 5 years. Of those who supervised, 66.7% had 5 years or less supervision experience, and 55% had supervised 10 or fewer students. The majority became supervisors because they enjoy teaching and contributing to the profession. Common reasons for not supervising include no local graduate program, and had never been asked to supervise. Live supervision is the most prevalent student evaluation method: every supervisor reported providing one-on-one oral feedback, and 47.3% indicated that they always provide feedback immediately following a counseling session. The most frequent challenges involve students who lack technical knowledge and who fail to incorporate feedback. Training, policy, and research implications are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.