Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26142291›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2015

All the way from the cortex: a review of auditory corticosubcollicular pathways.

Enrique Saldaña

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrique SaldañaNeurohistology Laboratory, Neuroscience Institute of Castilla y León (INCyL), University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. saldana@usal.es.
Universidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enrico Mugnaini has devoted part of his long and fruitful neuroscientific career to investigating the structural similarities between the cerebellar cortex and one of the first relay stations of the mammalian auditory pathway: the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The hypothesis of the cerebellar-like nature of the superficial layers of the dorsal cochlear nucleus received definitive support with the discovery and extensive characterization in his laboratory of unipolar brush cells, a neuron type unique to certain regions of the cerebellar cortex and to the granule cell domains of the cochlear nuclei. Paradoxically, a different line of research carried out in his laboratory revealed that, unlike the mammalian cerebellar cortex, the dorsal cochlear nucleus receives direct projections from the cerebral cortex, a fact that constitutes one of the main differences between the cerebellum and the dorsal cochlear nucleus. In an article published in 1995, Mugnaini's group described in detail the novel direct projections from the rat auditory neocortex to various subcollicular auditory centers, including the nucleus sagulum, the paralemniscal regions, the superior olivary complex, and the cochlear nuclei (Feliciano et al., Auditory Neuroscience 1995; 1:287-308). This review gives Enrico Mugnaini credit for his seminal contribution to the knowledge of auditory corticosubcollicular projections and summarizes how this growing field has evolved in the last 20 years.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysCerebral CortexHumansNeuronsOlivary NucleusAuditory cortexCochleaCochlear nucleusNucleus sagulumOlivocochlearSuperior olivary complex

Identifiers

PMID26142291
OpenAlexW848568893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.