Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26141925›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2016

Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness.

Jie Hu, Philip R Blue, Hongbo Yu, Xiaoliang Gong, Yang Xiang, Changjun Jiang, Xiaolin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Brain-To-Brain Mechanism for Social Transmission of Threat Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Neurocomputational evidence that conflicting prosocial motives guide distributive justice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie HuCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Philip R BlueCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Hongbo YuCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Xiaoliang GongKey Laboratory of Embedded System and Service Computing (Ministry of Education), Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Yang XiangKey Laboratory of Embedded System and Service Computing (Ministry of Education), Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Changjun JiangKey Laboratory of Embedded System and Service Computing (Ministry of Education), Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Xiaolin ZhouCenter for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China, Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health, Beijing 100871, China, and PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China xz104@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In human society, which is organized by social hierarchies, resources are usually allocated unequally and based on social status. In this study, we analyze how being endowed with different social statuses in a math competition affects the perception of fairness during asset allocation in a subsequent Ultimatum Game (UG). Behavioral data showed that when participants were in high status, they were more likely to reject unfair UG offers than in low status. This effect of social status correlated with activity in the right anterior insula (rAI) and with the functional connectivity between the rAI and a region in the anterior middle cingulate cortex, indicating that these two brain regions are crucial for integrating contextual factors and social norms during fairness perception. Additionally, there was an interaction between social status and UG offer fairness in the amygdala and thalamus, implicating the role of these regions in the modulation of social status on fairness perception. These results demonstrate the effect of social status on fairness perception and the potential neural underpinnings for this effect.

Indexed as

Hierarchy, SocialMagnetic Resonance ImagingMathematicsSocial JusticeSocial PerceptionAmygdalaBrain MappingCerebral CortexCompetitive BehaviorDominance, CerebralEmotionsFemaleGyrus CinguliHippocampusHumansMaleaMCCamygdalafairness perceptionfMRIinsulasocial status

Identifiers

PMID26141925
PMCPMC4692311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.