ArticleImplementation science : IS2015
Bringing it home: expanding the local reach of dissemination and implementation training via a university-based workshop.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Measuring continuing medical education conference impact and attendee experience: a scoping review.International journal of medical education · 2024Article
- Evaluation and lessons learned from the dissemination and implementation science scholars program in the national cancer prevention and control research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to inform development of a Dissemination and Implementation science training for nutrition practitioners.Public health nutrition · 2023Article
- Areas of strength and opportunities for growth in translational science education and training: Results of a scoping review from the NCATS Education Branch.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Design, delivery, and evaluation of a knowledge translation intervention for multi-stakeholders.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Addressing the "Last Mile" Problem in Educational Research: Educational Researchers' Interest, Knowledge, and Use of Implementation Science Constructs.Educational research and evaluation : an international journal on theory and practice · 2023Article
- Building implementation science capacity among practitioners of cancer control: development of a pilot training curriculum.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Review
- Leveraging academic initiatives to advance implementation practice: a scoping review of capacity building interventions.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- Article
- Implementing Implementation Research: Teaching Implementation Research to HIV Researchers.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2021Review
- Awareness and Acceptability of Undetectable = Untransmittable Among a U.S. National Sample of HIV-Negative Sexual and Gender Minorities.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
- Roles dissemination and implementation scientists can play in supporting research teams.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- The "secret sauce" for a mentored training program: qualitative perspectives of trainees in implementation research for cancer control.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Mentored training and its association with dissemination and implementation research output: a quasi-experimental evaluation.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Advancing health equity through CTSA programs: Opportunities for interaction between health equity, dissemination and implementation, and translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- The University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Training Program in Implementation Science: Program Experiences and Outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Developing implementation research capacity: longitudinal evaluation of the King's College London Implementation Science Masterclass, 2014-2019.Implementation science communications · 2020Article
- A literature review of knowledge translation and partnership research training programs for health researchers.Health research policy and systems · 2019Review
- Online Resources for Dissemination and Implementation Science: Meeting Demand and Lessons Learned.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, national training programs do not have the capacity to meet the growing demand for dissemination and implementation (D&I) workforce education and development. The Colorado Research in Implementation Science Program (CRISP) developed and delivered an introductory D&I workshop adapted from national programs to extend training reach and foster a local learning community for D&I.
methodsTo gauge interest and assess learning needs, a pre-registration survey was administered. Based on feedback, a 1.5-day workshop was designed. Day 1 introduced D&I frameworks, strategies, and evaluation principles. Local and national D&I experts provided ignite-style talks on key lessons followed by panel discussion. Breakout sessions discussed community engagement and applying for D&I grants. A workbook was developed to enhance the training and provided exercises for application to an individual's projects. Day 2 offered expert-led mentoring sessions with selected participants who desired advanced instruction. Two follow-up surveys (immediate post-workshop, 6 months) assessed knowledge gained from participation and utilization of workshop content.
resultsNinety-three workshop registrants completed an assessment survey to inform workshop objectives and curriculum design; 43 % were new and 54 % reported a basic understanding of the D&I field. Pre-registrants intended to use the training to "apply for a D&I grant" (73 %); "incorporate D&I into existing projects" (76 %), and for quality improvement (51 %). Sixty-eight individuals attended Day 1; 11 also attended Day 2 mentoring sessions. In the 1-week post-workshop survey (n = 34), 100 % strongly agreed they were satisfied with the training; 97 % strongly agreed the workshop workbook was a valuable resource. All Day 2 participants strongly agreed that working closely with faculty and experts increased their overall confidence. In the 6-month follow-up evaluation (n = 23), evidence of new D&I-related manuscripts and grant proposals was found. Training materials were published online ( www.ucdenver.edu/implementation/workshops ) and disseminated via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium. To sustain reach, CRISP adapted the materials into an interactive e-book ( www.CRISPebooks.org ) and launched a new graduate course.
conclusionsLocal D&I training workshops can extend the reach of national training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.