Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26141495›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2015

Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.

Johannes Leitgeb, Rupert Schuster, Bit New Yee, Pui Fong Chee, Julian-Camill Harnoss, Peter Starzengruber, Michael Schäffer, Ojan Assadian

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes LeitgebDepartment for Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert SchusterDepartment for Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Bit New YeeScience & Technology Innovation Centre, Ansell Shah Alam, 40000, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Pui Fong CheeScience & Technology Innovation Centre, Ansell Shah Alam, 40000, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Julian-Camill HarnossDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter StarzengruberDepartment for Hospital Hygiene, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Michael SchäfferDepartment for General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Böheimstrasse 37, D-70199, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ojan AssadianInstitute for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, School of Human & Health Sciences, R1/29 Ramsden Building, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK. o.assadian@hud.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA surgical glove will protect surgeons and patients only if the glove's integrity remains intact. However, several studies have demonstrated that undetected micro-perforations of surgical gloves are common. Because of the possibility of surgical glove puncture, an antimicrobial surgical glove was developed. The aim of this laboratory based experimental study was to assess the antibacterial efficacy of the interior chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG)-coat of an antimicrobial synthetic polyisoprene surgical glove by using a standardized microbiological challenge.

methodsSixteen healthy adult participants donned one antimicrobial surgical glove and one non-antimicrobial surgical glove randomly allocated to their dominant and non-dominant hand following a crossover design. During a 2-h wear time, participants performed standardized finger and hand movements. Thereafter, the interior surface of excised fingers of the removed gloves was challenged with 8.00 log10 cfu/mL S. aureus (ATCC 6538) or K. pneumoniae (ATCC 4352), respectively. The main outcome measure was the viable mean log10 cfu counts of the two glove groups after 5 min contact with the interior glove's surface.

resultsWhen comparing an antimicrobial glove against an untreated reference glove after 2-h simulated use wear-time, a mean reduction factor of 6.24 log10 (S. aureus) and 6.22 log10 (K. pneumoniae) was achieved after 5 min contact.

conclusionThese results demonstrate that wearing antibacterial gloves on hands does not negatively impact their antibacterial activity after 2-h of wear. This may have a potential benefit for patient safety in case of glove puncture during surgical procedures.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial LoadChlorhexidineCross-Over StudiesGloves, SurgicalHealthy VolunteersHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconate

Identifiers

PMID26141495
PMCPMC4490737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.