Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26141379›Full record

Trial reportReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2015

Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study.

Barbara Wirleitner, Maximilian Schuff, Pierre Vanderzwalmen, Astrid Stecher, Jasmin Okhowat, Libor Hradecký, Tomáš Kohoutek, Milena Králícková, Dietmar Spitzer, Nicolas H Zech

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Early Embryogenesis: Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Barbara WirleitnerIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. b.wirleitner@ivf.at.
Maximilian SchuffIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. m.schuff@ivf.at.
Pierre VanderzwalmenIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. pierrevdz@hotmail.com.
Astrid StecherIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. a.stecher@ivf.at.
Jasmin OkhowatIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. j.okhowat@ivf.at.
Libor HradeckýIVF Centers Prof. Zech, B. Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic. l.hradecky@ivf-institut.cz.
Tomáš KohoutekIVF Centers Prof. Zech, B. Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic. t.kohoutek@ivf-institut.cz.
Milena KrálíckováDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Karlovarská 48, 30166, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Milena.Kralickova@lfp.cuni.cz.
Dietmar SpitzerIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Innsbrucker Bundesstr. 35, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. d.spitzer@salzburg.ivf.at.
Nicolas H ZechIVF Centers Prof. Zech, Römerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria. n.zech@ivf.at.
IVF Centers Prof. Zech · ATCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful embryo implantation depends on a well-timed maternal-embryonic crosstalk. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secreted by the embryo is known to play a key role in this process and to trigger a complex signal transduction cascade allowing the apposition, attachment, and invasion of the embryo into the decidualized uterus. Production of hCG was reported to be dependent on blastocyst quality and several articles suggested that intrauterine hCG injection increases pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF patients. However, no study has as yet analysed birth rates as final outcome. Our objective was to determine whether clinical outcome after blastocyst transfer can be improved by intrauterine injection of hCG and whether this is dependent on blastocyst quality.

methodsA prospective randomised study was conducted in two settings. In cohort A, hCG application was performed two days before blastocyst transfer. In cohort B, the administration of hCG occurred just prior to embryo transfer on day 5. For both cohorts, patients were randomised to either intrauterine hCG application or to the control group that received culture medium. Clinical outcome was analysed according to blastocyst quality of transferred embryos.

resultsThe outcome of 182 IVF-cycles (cohort A) and 1004 IVF-cycles (cohort B) was analysed. All patients received a fresh autologous blastocyst transfer on day five. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rates (PR), clinical pregnancy rates (cPR), miscarriage rates (MR), and live birth rates (LBR). No improvement of clinical outcome after intrauterine hCG administration on day 3 (cohort A) or day 5 (cohort B) was found, independently of blastocyst quality transferred. The final outcome in cohort A: LBR after transfer of top blastocysts was 50.0 % with hCG and 53.3 % in the control group. With non-top blastocysts, LBR of 17.1 % (hCG) and 18.2 % (control) were observed (n.s.). In cohort B, LBR with top blastocysts was 53.3 % (hCG) and 48.4 % (control), with non-top blastocysts it came to 28.7 % (hCG) and 35.0 % (control). The differences between the groups were statistically not significant. Furthermore, we investigated a possible benefit of hCG administration in correlation with female age. In both age groups (<38 years and ≥ 38 years) we found similar LBR after treatment with hCG vs. medium. A LBR of 47.1 % vs. 48.7 % was obtained in the younger group and 26.6 % vs. 30.8 % in the older group.

conclusionsIn contrast to previous studies indicating a substantial benefit from intrauterine hCG application in cleavage stage embryo transfers, in our study we could not find any evidence for improvement of clinical outcome in blastocyst transfer cycles, neither with top nor with non-top quality morphology.

Indexed as

Pregnancy RateAdultBirth RateBlastocystChorionic GonadotropinEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultChorionic Gonadotropin

Identifiers

PMID26141379
PMCPMC4491277
OpenAlexW1560695875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.