Trial reportBMJ open2015
Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris in Assisted Reproductive Technology--ESPART: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02047227 (A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Multicentre, Parallel Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris®), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Multicentre, Parallel Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris® (Follitropin Alfa and Lutropin Alfa) and GONAL-f® (Follitropin Alfa) for Multifollicular Development as Part of an Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment Cycle in Poor Ovarian Responders, as Defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Criteria
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2017Trial
- Study of clinical experience with different approaches to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a focus on safety and efficacy.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Article
- Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Low Prognosis Patients According to the POSEIDON Criteria: An Analysis of 26,697 Cycles ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2019Article
- Use of assisted reproductive technologies before and after the Artificial Reproduction Act in Taiwan.PloS one · 2018Article
- Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical aspects of ovulation induction agents: A review of the literature.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe results of a recent meta-analysis showed that adding recombinant human luteinising hormone (r-hLH) to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) for ovarian stimulation was beneficial in poor responders, resulting in a 30% relative increase in the clinical pregnancy rate compared with r-hFSH monotherapy. However, a limitation of the meta-analysis was that the included studies used heterogeneous definitions of poor ovarian response (POR). Furthermore, the use of r-hLH supplementation during ovarian stimulation is a topic of ongoing debate, and well-designed, adequately powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trials in this setting are warranted. Therefore, the objective of the ESPART trial is to explore the possible superiority of a fixed-dose combination of r-hFSH plus r-hLH over r-hFSH monotherapy in patients with POR, as per a definition aligned with the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Bologna criteria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase III, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Approximately 946 women aged 18-<41 years from 18 countries will be randomised (1:1) to receive a fixed-dose combination of r-hFSH plus r-hLH in a 2:1 ratio (Pergoveris) or r-hFSH monotherapy (GONAL-f). The primary end point is the total number of retrieved oocytes per participant. Secondary end points include: ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Safety end points include: incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and of adverse events and serious adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, with the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice guidelines and all applicable regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to entry. The results of this study will be publically disseminated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02047227; EudraCT Number: 2013-003817-16; Clinical Trial Protocol Number: EMR200061-005 V.3.0, 15 April 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.