Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26141305›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris in Assisted Reproductive Technology--ESPART: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.

P Humaidan, J Schertz, R Fischer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02047227 (A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Multicentre, Parallel Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris®), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02047227 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Multicentre, Parallel Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris® (Follitropin Alfa and Lutropin Alfa) and GONAL-f® (Follitropin Alfa) for Multifollicular Development as Part of an Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment Cycle in Poor Ovarian Responders, as Defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Criteria

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyRan2014 to 2015Enrolled939ConditionsInfertilityArmsPergoveris®, GONAL-f®, Recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (r-hCG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P HumaidanThe Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Denmark Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
J SchertzFertility Global Clinical Development Unit, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA.
R FischerFertility Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Research & Development Institute · USSkive Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe results of a recent meta-analysis showed that adding recombinant human luteinising hormone (r-hLH) to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) for ovarian stimulation was beneficial in poor responders, resulting in a 30% relative increase in the clinical pregnancy rate compared with r-hFSH monotherapy. However, a limitation of the meta-analysis was that the included studies used heterogeneous definitions of poor ovarian response (POR). Furthermore, the use of r-hLH supplementation during ovarian stimulation is a topic of ongoing debate, and well-designed, adequately powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trials in this setting are warranted. Therefore, the objective of the ESPART trial is to explore the possible superiority of a fixed-dose combination of r-hFSH plus r-hLH over r-hFSH monotherapy in patients with POR, as per a definition aligned with the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Bologna criteria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase III, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Approximately 946 women aged 18-<41 years from 18 countries will be randomised (1:1) to receive a fixed-dose combination of r-hFSH plus r-hLH in a 2:1 ratio (Pergoveris) or r-hFSH monotherapy (GONAL-f). The primary end point is the total number of retrieved oocytes per participant. Secondary end points include: ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Safety end points include: incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and of adverse events and serious adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, with the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice guidelines and all applicable regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to entry. The results of this study will be publically disseminated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02047227; EudraCT Number: 2013-003817-16; Clinical Trial Protocol Number: EMR200061-005 V.3.0, 15 April 2014.

Indexed as

Ovulation InductionAdolescentAdultDrug CombinationsFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansInfertilityLuteinizing HormoneOocyte RetrievalOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromePregnancyPregnancy RateResearch DesignSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicYoung AdultDrug CombinationsFollicle Stimulating HormoneLuteinizing HormonepergoverisREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26141305
PMCPMC4499676
OpenAlexW2112864410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.