Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26141193›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Effects of acute or repeated paroxetine and fluoxetine treatment on affective behavior in male and female adolescent rats.

Leslie R Amodeo, Venuz Y Greenfield, Danielle E Humphrey, Veronica Varela, Joseph A Pipkin, Shannon E Eaton, Jelesa D Johnson, Christopher P Plant, Zachary R Harmony, Li Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie R AmodeoDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA, 92407, USA.
Venuz Y Greenfield
Danielle E Humphrey
Veronica Varela
Joseph A Pipkin
Shannon E Eaton
Jelesa D Johnson
Christopher P Plant
Zachary R Harmony
Li Wang
Cynthia A Crawford
California State University System · USCalifornia State University, San Bernardino · US

Funding

CSU San Bernardino Minority Access to Research CareersT34GM083883 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI MCDOUGALL, SANDERS · 2009 to 2019
$3.0M
CSUSB - DIDARPR24DA033877 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI CRAWFORD, CYNTHIA A. · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
CSUSB RISE ProgramR25GM100829 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI CRAWFORD, CYNTHIA A. · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
CSUSB Minority Drug Abuse Research ProgramR24DA025319 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI CRAWFORD, CYNTHIA A. · 2009 to 2010
$852k
NIDA NIH HHS DA025319NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA025319NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA033877NIGMS NIH HHS GM083883NIGMS NIH HHS GM100829NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM100829NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM083883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe SSRI antidepressant fluoxetine is one of the few drugs that is effective at treating depression in adolescent humans. In contrast, the SSRI paroxetine has limited efficacy and is more at risk for inducing suicidal behavior.

objectiveThe purpose of the present study was to more fully characterize the differential actions of paroxetine and fluoxetine.

methodsIn experiment 1, male and female rats were injected with paroxetine (2.5 or 10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), or vehicle for 10 days starting on postnatal day (PD) 35, and affective behaviors were assessed using sucrose preference and elevated plus maze tasks. A separate set of rats were used to examine monoamine levels. In experiment 2, rats were injected with paroxetine (2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg), or vehicle during the same time frame as experiment 1, and anxiety-like behaviors were measured using elevated plus maze, light/dark box, and acoustic startle.

resultsRepeated SSRI treatment failed to alter sucrose preference, although both paroxetine and fluoxetine reduced time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze and light compartment of the light/dark box. Paroxetine, but not fluoxetine, enhanced acoustic startle and interfered with habituation. Serotonin turnover was decreased by both acute and repeated fluoxetine treatment but unaltered by paroxetine administration. DISCUSSION: These results show that repeated treatment with paroxetine and fluoxetine has dissociable actions in adolescent rats. In particular, paroxetine, but not fluoxetine, increases acoustic startle at low doses and may increase sensitivity to environmental stressors.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAnxietyDepressive DisorderDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFluoxetineMaleMaze LearningMood DisordersParoxetineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySensory GatingTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationFluoxetineParoxetine

Identifiers

PMID26141193
PMCPMC4561584
OpenAlexW1857563706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.