Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26140728›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2015

Let's talk about death: data collection for verbal autopsies in a demographic and health surveillance site in Malaysia.

Pascale A Allotey, Daniel D Reidpath, Natalie C Evans, Nirmala Devarajan, Kanason Rajagobal, Ruhaida Bachok, Kridaraan Komahan, SEACO Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Perinatal mortality in eastern Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pascale A AlloteySouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
Daniel D ReidpathSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
Natalie C EvansSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
Nirmala DevarajanSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
Kanason RajagobalSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
Ruhaida BachokSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
Kridaraan KomahanSouth East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University, Segamat, Malaysia.
SEACO Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVerbal autopsies have gained considerable ground as an acceptable alternative to medically determined cause of death. Unlike with clinical or more administrative settings for data collection, verbal autopsies require significant involvement of families and communities, which introduces important social and cultural considerations. However, there is very little clear guidance about the methodological issues in data collection. The objectives of this case study were: to explore the range of bereavement rituals within the multi-ethnic, multi-faith population of the district; to investigate the preparedness of communities to talk about death; to describe the verbal autopsy process; to assess the effects of collecting verbal autopsy data on data collectors; and to determine the most accurate sources of information about deaths in the community.

methodsA case study approach was used, using focus group discussions, indepth interviews and field notes. Thematic analyses were undertaken using NVivo.

resultsConsideration of cultural bereavement practices is importance to acceptance and response rates to verbal autopsies. They are also important to the timing of verbal autopsy interviews. Well trained data collectors, regardless of health qualifications are able to collect good quality data, but debriefing is important to their health and well being. This article contributes to guidance on the data collection procedures for verbal autopsies within community settings.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathCultural CharacteristicsAutopsyBereavementData CollectionFamilyFocus GroupsHumansInterpersonal RelationsMalaysiaPilot ProjectsPopulation SurveillanceResidence CharacteristicsSocial StigmaSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesbeliefsbereavementcause of deathcustomshealth and demographic surveillanceSEACOverbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID26140728
PMCPMC4490796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.