ArticleThe British journal of radiology2015
Evaluation of current clinical target volume definitions for glioblastoma using cell-based dosimetry stochastic methods.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated Monte Carlo Model for Heterogeneous Glioblastoma Treated with Boron Neutron Capture Therapy.Cancers · 2023Article
- Impact on Radiation Dose and Volume V57 Gy of the Brain on Recurrence and Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiformae.Radiology and oncology · 2017Article
- Development of an integrated Monte Carlo model for glioblastoma multiforme treated with boron neutron capture therapy.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDetermination of an optimal clinical target volume (CTV) is complex and remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to develop a glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) model to be used for evaluation of current CTV practices for external radiotherapy.
methodsThe GBM model was structured as follows: (1) a Geant4 cellular model was developed to calculate the absorbed dose in individual cells represented by cubic voxels of 20 μm sides. The system was irradiated with opposing 6 MV X-ray beams. The beams encompassed planning target volumes corresponding to 2.0- and 2.5-cm CTV margins; (2) microscopic extension probability (MEP) models were developed using MATLAB(®) 2012a (MathWorks(®), Natick, MA), based on clinical studies reporting on GBM clonogenic spread; (3) the cellular dose distribution was convolved with the MEP models to evaluate cellular survival fractions (SFs) for both CTV margins.
resultsA CTV margin of 2.5 cm, compared to a 2.0-cm CTV margin, resulted in a reduced total SF from 12.9% ± 0.9% to 3.6% ± 0.2%, 5.5% ± 0.4% to 1.2% ± 0.1% and 11.1% ± 0.7% to 3.0% ± 0.2% for circular, elliptical and irregular MEP distributions, respectively.
conclusionA Monte Carlo model was developed to quantitatively evaluate the impact of GBM CTV margins on total and penumbral SF. The results suggest that the reduction in total SF ranges from 3.5 to 5, when the CTV is extended by 0.5 cm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The model provides a quantitative tool for evaluation of different CTV margins in terms of cell kill efficacy. Cellular platform of the tool allows future incorporation of cellular properties of GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.