ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2015
Concordance between Composite International Diagnostic Interview and self-reports of depressive symptoms: a re-analysis.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anxiety-depression symptom networks across emotion regulation profiles in Chinese nurses: a latent profile and network analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Using network analysis to identify central symptoms of depression and anxiety in different profiles of infertility patients.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Elucidating the structure of depressive symptoms, emotion regulation, and their interrelatedness in autistic adults: A network analysis.Personality neuroscience · 2025Article
- Understanding of Depressive Symptomatology across Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder: A Network Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item Pairing Predictiveness for Prescreening Depressive Symptomatology: Machine Learning Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2023Article
- Deep learning paired with wearable passive sensing data predicts deterioration in anxiety disorder symptoms across 17-18 years.Journal of affective disorders · 2021Article
- Network structure of depression symptomology in participants with and without depressive disorder: the population-based Health 2000-2011 study.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020Article
- Network analysis of mood symptoms in adolescents with or at high risk for bipolar disorder.Bipolar disorders · 2020Article
- Adaptive and non-adaptive models of depression: A comparison using register data on antidepressant medication during divorce.PloS one · 2017Article
- Working conditions, psychosocial environmental factors, and depressive symptoms among wage workers in South Korea.International journal of occupational and environmental health · 2016Article
- Ethnic Variation in the Cross-sectional Association between Domains of Depressive Symptoms and Clinical Depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2016Article
- Depressive Symptoms Predict Major Depressive Disorder after 15 Years among Whites but Not Blacks.Frontiers in public health · 2016Article
- Concordance between Composite International Diagnostic Interview and self-reports of depressive symptoms: a re-analysis.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concordance between sum scores of self-reported depressive symptoms and structured interview diagnoses has been studied extensively, but are these the best attainable self-report-based predictions for interview diagnoses? We maximized the cross-validated concordance between World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) diagnosis and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), from the viewpoint of exploratory statistics, re-analysing Health 2000 general-population sample of adults over 30 years in mainland Finland (N = 5200-5435). BDI sum-score prediction of CIDI diagnosis could be superseded by using (1) weighted sums of items, (2) classification trees constructed from items, or (3) a single item. Best solution (2) yielded cross-validated Youden's Index 0.757 [standard error (SE) = 0.001, sensitivity = 0.907, specificity = 0.851], improving the concordance to 1.07-fold (1.18-fold for 12-month diagnosis). A single-item solution was best for the GHQ. All positive predictive values remained low (0.09-0.31). Thus, CIDI-to-questionnaire concordance can be improved by using all information in the questionnaires instead of just sum scores, but latent-trait theory for questionnaires is incompatible with interview diagnoses (single item achieved better concordance than summing all). Self-reports have low predictive value for CIDI diagnoses in the general population, but better in settings with higher major depressive disorder (MDD) base rates. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.