ReviewGigaScience2015
Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: fostering open science and data reuse.
Review in GigaScience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- What's the TEE: Metrics of Temperature Extremes in Europe NUTS Regions (1980-2024).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic Price Effects for Lake Water Quality.Land economics · 2024Article
- Not just crop or forest: an integrated land cover map for agricultural and natural areas.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Integrating databases for spatial analysis of parasite-host associations and the novel Brazilian dataset.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Indicators of the effects of climate change on freshwater ecosystems.Climatic change · 2023Article
- Satellites quantify the spatial extent of cyanobacterial blooms across the United States at multiple scales.Ecological indicators · 2022Article
- Assessing Evidence of Phosphorus Concentration Trends in North American Fresh Waters.Journal of the American Water Resources Association · 2021Article
- Analyzing long-term water quality of lakes in Rhode Island and the northeastern United States with an anomaly approach.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2021Article
- Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- The global lake area, climate, and population dataset.Scientific data · 2020Article
- Lake Water Levels and Associated Hydrologic Characteristics in the Conterminous U.S.Journal of the American Water Resources Association · 2020Article
- Article
- Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019Article
- Current Challenges in Plant Eco-Metabolomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Herbarium data: Global biodiversity and societal botanical needs for novel research.Applications in plant sciences · 2018Review
- LAGOS-NE: a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of US lakes.GigaScience · 2017Article
- Wetland characteristics linked to broad-scale patterns in Culiseta melanura abundance and eastern equine encephalitis virus infection.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Skills and Knowledge for Data-Intensive Environmental Research.Bioscience · 2017Article
- A database of georeferenced nutrient chemistry data for mountain lakes of the Western United States.Scientific data · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although there are considerable site-based data for individual or groups of ecosystems, these datasets are widely scattered, have different data formats and conventions, and often have limited accessibility. At the broader scale, national datasets exist for a large number of geospatial features of land, water, and air that are needed to fully understand variation among these ecosystems. However, such datasets originate from different sources and have different spatial and temporal resolutions. By taking an open-science perspective and by combining site-based ecosystem datasets and national geospatial datasets, science gains the ability to ask important research questions related to grand environmental challenges that operate at broad scales. Documentation of such complicated database integration efforts, through peer-reviewed papers, is recommended to foster reproducibility and future use of the integrated database. Here, we describe the major steps, challenges, and considerations in building an integrated database of lake ecosystems, called LAGOS (LAke multi-scaled GeOSpatial and temporal database), that was developed at the sub-continental study extent of 17 US states (1,800,000 km(2)). LAGOS includes two modules: LAGOSGEO, with geospatial data on every lake with surface area larger than 4 ha in the study extent (~50,000 lakes), including climate, atmospheric deposition, land use/cover, hydrology, geology, and topography measured across a range of spatial and temporal extents; and LAGOSLIMNO, with lake water quality data compiled from ~100 individual datasets for a subset of lakes in the study extent (~10,000 lakes). Procedures for the integration of datasets included: creating a flexible database design; authoring and integrating metadata; documenting data provenance; quantifying spatial measures of geographic data; quality-controlling integrated and derived data; and extensively documenting the database. Our procedures make a large, complex, and integrated database reproducible and extensible, allowing users to ask new research questions with the existing database or through the addition of new data. The largest challenge of this task was the heterogeneity of the data, formats, and metadata. Many steps of data integration need manual input from experts in diverse fields, requiring close collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.