ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2014
Restoring Emphasis on Ambulatory Internal Medicine Training-The 3∶1 Model.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of Block Ambulatory Scheduling on Internal Medicine Residencies: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Factors Affecting Resident Satisfaction in Continuity Clinic-a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Firsthand Accounts of Practicing Generalists-Internal Medicine Residency and the 'Leap of Faith' into Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Education Research: Integration of Trainee and Faculty Clinics at an Academic Medical Center: Improving Quality of Care and Education.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- A Decade of Teaching and Learning in Internal Medicine Ambulatory Education: A Scoping Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- A 5-day intensive curriculum for interns utilizing simulation and active-learning techniques: addressing domains important across internal medicine practice.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Restoration of resident sleep and wellness with block scheduling.Medical education · 2017Observational
- An Interactive Ambulatory Nephrology Curriculum for Internal Medicine Interns: Design, Implementation, and Participant Feedback.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2017Article
- Impact of X+Y Scheduling on Pediatric Resident and Faculty Perceptions of Education and Patient Care.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResident dissatisfaction in ambulatory care training has prompted the need for new scheduling models that support a positive learning climate.
interventionWe instituted a 3∶1 scheduling model for postgraduate year (PGY)-2 and PGY-3 residents. We hypothesized this model would provide a more structured ambulatory educational atmosphere, better continuity of care, and more exposure to subspecialty outpatient medicine. This model would also eliminate conflict with inpatient duties and contribute to enhance residents' satisfaction with ambulatory medicine and their ambulatory education experience. The model used weeklong ambulatory blocks every fourth week, consisting of morning continuity clinic and afternoon subspecialty clinics. The PGY-1 residents maintained a traditional schedule.
resultsResidents were surveyed regarding their ambulatory experience, with an overall response rate of 73 of 80 (91%). The PGY-2 and PGY-3 responses were analyzed descriptively and compared with PGY-1 responses. Residents reported that the 3∶1 model positively affected their satisfaction with residency training in general, their satisfaction with outpatient/primary care training, and their outpatient/clinic educational experience. Residents in the 3∶1 model perceived improvements in continuity of care and in the quality of care they provided for patients. The experience in ambulatory subspecialty training was positive.
conclusionsA 3∶1 scheduling model appears to mitigate some of the conflict between inpatient and outpatient duties. Residents agreed the new model promoted an improved ambulatory experience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.