Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26139870›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2015

Optimization of ultrasound-assisted-extraction of porcine placenta water-soluble proteins and evaluation of the antioxidant activity.

Wen-Lin Tang, Min Zhang, Zhongxiang Fang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen-Lin TangState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Lihu Rd 1800, Wuxi, 214122 China.
Min ZhangState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Lihu Rd 1800, Wuxi, 214122 China.
Zhongxiang FangSchool of Public Health, International Institute of Agri-Food Security (IIAFS), Curtin University, Perth, 6845 GPO Box U1987, WA Australia.
Jiangnan University · CNCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine placenta is commonly used in Chinese as a traditional medicine. It has been reported by a number of researchers that the porcine placenta contains many compounds which have good health benefits. Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the parameters of ultrasound power, ultrasound treat time, and extraction temperature on the extraction yield of porcine placenta water-soluble proteins (PPWP). The results indicated that, under optimum conditions of ultrasound power 257 w, extraction temperature at 49 °C for 7 min, the extraction yield of PPWP was 32.7 %, which was significantly higher than that of the conventional extraction method (CEM) of 15.0 %. The experimental data were fitted to a second-order polynomial equation using multiple regression analysis and the estimated model showed a high capacity of predicting the dependent variables. Although not significantly, the antioxidant activity of PPWP from ultrasound-assist-extraction (UAE) were higher than those from CEM, indicated that UAE had a positive effect or at least no negative effect on the bioactivity of PPWP.

Indexed as

Antioxidant activityExtractionPorcine placentaProteinUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID26139870
PMCPMC4486545
OpenAlexW1981521550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.