Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26139355›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2016

Building knowledge requires bricks, not sand: The critical role of familiar constituents in learning.

Lynne M Reder, Xiaonan L Liu, Alexander Keinath, Vencislav Popov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Resting after learning or repeating the learned?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is There an Activity-silent Working Memory?Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lynne M RederDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. reder@cmu.edu.
Xiaonan L LiuDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Alexander KeinathDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Vencislav PopovDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

EXPLORING THE SAC MODEL OF MEMORYR01MH052808 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI REDER, LYNNE MARIE · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH052808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite vast efforts to better understand human learning, some principles have been overlooked; specifically, that less familiar stimuli are more difficult to combine to create new knowledge and that this is because less familiar stimuli consume more working memory resources. Participants previously unfamiliar with Chinese characters were trained to discriminate visually similar characters during a visual search task over the course of a month, during which half of the characters appeared much more frequently. Ability to form associations involving these characters was tested via cued recall for novel associations consisting of two Chinese characters and an English word. Each week performance improved on the cued-recall task. Crucially, however, even though all Chinese character pairs were novel each week, those pairs consisting of more familiar characters were more easily learned. Performance on a working-memory task was better for more familiar stimuli, consistent with the claim that familiar stimuli consume fewer working memory resources. These findings have implications for optimal instruction, including second language learning.

Indexed as

AdultAssociationCuesHumansKnowledgeLearningMemory, Short-TermMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyEncoding effectsEpisodic memoryHuman memory and learningWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.