ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2015
Delayed in vitro development of Up states but normal network plasticity in Fragile X circuits.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ex vivo cortical circuits learn to predict and spontaneously replay temporal patterns.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Creation of Neuronal Ensembles and Cell-Specific Homeostatic Plasticity through Chronic Sparse Optogenetic Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Paradoxical self-sustained dynamics emerge from orchestrated excitatory and inhibitory homeostatic plasticity rules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Mechanisms Driving the Emergence of Neuronal Hyperexcitability in Fragile X Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Differential Excitability of PV and SST Neurons Results in Distinct Functional Roles in Inhibition Stabilization of Up States.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Decreased reproducibility and abnormal experience-dependent plasticity of network dynamics in Fragile X circuits.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Identification of FMR1-regulated molecular networks in human neurodevelopment.Genome research · 2020Article
- Disrupted Cortical State Regulation in a Rat Model of Fragile X Syndrome.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017Article
- Sensory hypo-excitability in a rat model of fetal development in Fragile X Syndrome.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A broad range of neurophysiological phenotypes have been reported since the generation of the first mouse model of Fragile X syndrome (FXS). However, it remains unclear which phenotypes are causally related to the cognitive deficits associated with FXS. Indeed, because many of these phenotypes are known to be modulated by experience, a confounding factor in the interpretation of many studies is whether some phenotypes are an indirect consequence of abnormal development and experience. To help diminish this confound we first conducted an in vitro developmental study of spontaneous neural dynamics in cortical organotypic cultures. A significant developmental increase in network activity and Up states was observed in both wild-type and Fmr1(-/y) circuits, along with a specific developmental delay in the emergence of Up states in knockout circuits. To determine whether Up state regulation is generally impaired in FXS circuits, we examined Up state plasticity using chronic optogenetic stimulation. Wild-type and Fmr1(-/y) stimulated circuits exhibited a significant decrease in overall spontaneous activity including Up state frequency; however, no significant effect of genotype was observed. These results demonstrate that developmental delays characteristic of FXS are recapitulated during in vitro development, and that Up state abnormalities are probably a direct consequence of the disease, and not an indirect consequence of abnormal experience. However, the fact that Fmr1(-/y) circuits exhibited normal homeostatic modulation of Up states suggests that these plasticity mechanisms are largely intact, and that some of the previously reported plasticity deficits could reflect abnormal experience or the engagement of compensatory mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.