ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015
Recovery from musculoskeletal injury: the role of social support following a transport accident.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Interventions on Work Outcomes After Road Traffic Crash-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators Associated with Return to Work Following Minor to Serious Road Traffic Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma - instruments and methods: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- The Impact of Musculoskeletal Injuries Sustained in Road Traffic Crashes on Work-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- The development and internal validation of a model to predict functional recovery after trauma.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Left Behind After Impact: The Hidden Toll of Trauma Recovery in New Zealand.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Occupational Therapist Perspectives: Factors Influencing Recovery Following Motor Vehicle Accident Injury.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026Article
- Trajectory and Predictors of Return-to-Work Outcomes for People After a Road Traffic Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Perspectives of North American firefighters on navigating interventions and healthcare choices for work-related shoulder disorders.Discover public health · 2025Article
- Exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders in returning to work after minor to serious road traffic injuries: a qualitative study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Article
- A holistic approach for severe flexion contracture of bilateral hip, knee, and ankle joints in a neglected patient with prolonged knee-chest positioning on extreme undernourishment: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2022Review
- Psychosocial barriers and facilitators for a successful return to work following injury within firefighters.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022Article
- The role of specific sources of social support on postinjury psychological symptoms.Rehabilitation psychology · 2021Article
- Factors associated with persistent opioid use after an upper extremity fracture.Bone & joint open · 2021Article
- Predictors of return to work among women with long-term neck/shoulder and/or back pain: A 1-year prospective study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence in road traffic injury prevention: a scoping review of qualitative studies (2000 to 2019).Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2020Article
- The association between family cohesion and disability following blunt trauma: findings from a level-I trauma center in Saudi Arabia.Injury epidemiology · 2020Article
- Making Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Without Proxies: Part II.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2020Article
- Impact of interventions on work-related outcomes for individuals with musculoskeletal injuries after road traffic crash: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial support can be an important coping resource for persons recovering from injury. In this study, we examined the effects of family structure and sources of social support on physical health, persistent pain and return to work (RTW) outcomes following musculoskeletal injury (MSI) sustained in a transport accident.
methodsSecondary analysis of Transport Accident Commission (TAC) cross-sectional surveys held in 2010 and 2011 was conducted. In total 1649 persons with MSI were identified and included. Family structure was determined by marital status and number of children. Sources of social support were measured as perceived help from family, friends, neighbours and employers. Physical health was measured with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score of the Short-Form-12 Health Survey Version 2. Persistent pain was defined as self-reported persistent pain experienced in the last 3 months, and RTW was defined as being back at work for ≥3 months at time of interview. Multiple linear and logistic regressions were used for the analyses.
resultsFamily and friends' support was associated with better physical health among persons with >1 day hospital stay. Being married or in a de facto relationship was associated with greater PCS score among non-hospitalised persons. Being widowed/separated/divorced was associated with more self-reported persistent pain (odds ratio 1.62 [95 % confidence intervals 1.11-2.37]). Support from family (0.40 [0.24-0.68]), friends (0.29 [0.17-0.47]) and neighbours (0.59 [0.41-0.84]) was associated with less persistent pain. Among women, support from family (0.09 [0.01-0.78]) was negatively associated with RTW, whereas support from friends (3.03 [1.15-8.02]) was positively associated with RTW. These associations were not observed among men. For both men (5.62 [2.77-11.38]) and women (7.22 [2.58-20.20]), support from employers was positively associated with RTW.
conclusionFamily structure and sources of social support had a positive impact on physical health, persistent pain and RTW following MSI. This study highlights the importance of identifying people who have limited access to a social support network. Those with limited access to social support after a transport accident could potentially benefit from the provision of formal sources of practical and psychological support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.