Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26137932›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

What are the core predictors of 'hassles' among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross sectional study.

Charles Adeniji, Cassandra Kenning, Peter A Coventry, Peter Bower

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient perspectives on primary care for multimorbidity: An integrative review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Review
  7. Patient participation during primary health-care encounters among adult patients with multimorbidity: A cross-sectional study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles Adeniji*NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Charles.adeniji@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Cassandra KenningNIHR Collaboration for Applied Health Research and Care, Greater Manchester (GM-CLAHRC), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Cassandra.Kenning@manchester.ac.uk.
Peter A CoventryNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Peter.A.Coventry@manchester.ac.uk.
Peter BowerNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. peter.bower@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA limitation of service delivery in primary care in the United Kingdom is that services are often organised to manage discrete long-term conditions, using guidelines related to single conditions, and managed in clinics organised around single conditions. However, many older patients have more than one condition (so called multimorbidity). Qualitative research suggests that these patients experience 'hassles' in their care, including multiple appointments, poor co-ordination, and conflicting recommendations. However, there is limited quantitative evidence on the 'hassles' that patients with multimorbidity experience, or factors predicting 'hassles' in patients with multimorbidity.

methodsWe conducted a cross sectional study, mailing questionnaires to 1460 patients with multimorbidity identified from the disease registers of four general practices in the UK. Patients were asked to complete a range of self-report measures including measures of multimorbidity, measures of their experience of multimorbidity and service delivery. Data were analysed using regression modelling to assess the factors predicting 'hassles' in patients with multimorbidity.

resultsIn total 33% (n = 486) of patients responded to the baseline survey. The 'hassles' most often reported by patients related to lack of information about conditions and treatment options, poor communication among health professionals, and poor access to specialist care. There was a significant relationship between numbers of conditions, and reports of 'hassles'. In multivariate analysis, 5 variables predicted more 'hassles': more long-term conditions, symptoms of anxiety and depression, younger age, being in paid employment, and not having a discussion with their GP in the last 12 months.

conclusionHassles are frequently reported by patients with multimorbidity in primary care. A priority for future research should be on the development of new models of care that better cater for these patients. This research highlights core hassles that need to be addressed, and the patient groups that are most at risk, which may aid in the design of these new models.

Indexed as

ComorbidityGeneral PracticePrimary Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppointments and SchedulesCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionDisease ManagementFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID26137932
PMCPMC4489210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.