ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2014
Surveillance of adverse events following immunization with meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine: Tuscany, 2005-2012.
Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of routine childhood vaccine coadministration versus separate vaccination.BMJ global health · 2022Observational
- Co-administration of vaccines: a focus on tetravalent Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella (MMRV) and meningococcal C conjugate vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- [Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in Brazil, 2014 to 2016Análisis del Sistema de Información de Vigilancia de Eventos Adversos Posvacunación en Brasil, 2014 a 2016].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPost-licensure vaccine safety studies are essential to identify uncommon events that may be difficult to assess during pre-licensure studies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety of serogroup C meningococcal conjugate (MCC) vaccine in Tuscany from 2005 to 2012.
methodsAll adverse events (AEs) to MCC vaccine notified from 2005 to 2012 were obtained from the regional health authority.
resultsFollowing 451,570 doses administered, 110 suspected AEs were notified (mean annual reporting rate: 2.8/10,000 doses). The most frequently AE reported was fever (60%), followed by swelling at the injection site (11%) and febrile seizures (10%). Overall, 77.3% of cases were not severe, while 21.8% required hospitalization. Almost four months after the receipt of the vaccine, a one-year-old infant was diagnosed with a pervasive developmental disorder with disturbance of speech, but any link with the vaccinations received was refuted. Most AEs (80.9%) occurred after co-administration with other vaccines, especially with MMR or MMRV vaccines (42.7%) or the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (33.7%). DISCUSSION: Our study confirmed the high level of safety of MCC vaccine in Tuscany: AEs proved rare and all cases had only temporary and self-resolving consequences. As usually only the most severe suspected AEs are reported, the true proportion of AEs requiring hospitalization was most probably overestimated, and it is plausible that most of these cases were in fact only temporally related.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26137788PMC4718312What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.