ArticleEBioMedicine2015
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures of Brain Structure to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00693849 (International Study to Predict Optimised Treatment - in Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Study to Predict Optimised Treatment - in Depression
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brain connectivity in major depressive disorder: a precision component of treatment modalities?Translational psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- An fMRI Investigation into the Effects of Ketogenic Medium-Chain Triglycerides on Cognitive Function in Elderly Adults: A Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2021Trial
- Brain network dysfunction and treatment-induced network reorganization in major depressive disorder.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Predicting treatment response in individuals with major depressive disorder using structural MRI-based similarity features.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Personalized use of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- A review of diffusion MRI in mood disorders: mechanisms and predictors of treatment response.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Benchmarking Mental Health Status Using Passive Sensor Data: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Neuroanatomical dimensions in medication-free individuals with major depressive disorder and treatment response to SSRI antidepressant medications or placebo.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Understanding mental health through computers: An introduction to computational psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment for Neuroimaging in Depressive Disorders.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?iScience · 2022Article
- Influence and interaction of resting state functional magnetic resonance and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 methylation on short-term antidepressant drug response.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Age-dependent brain morphometry in Major Depressive disorder.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Functional connectivity between the amygdala and subgenual cingulate gyrus predicts the antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2021Article
- The Application of a Machine Learning-Based Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approach in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- White Matter Microstructure Alterations Associated With Paroxetine Treatment Response in Major Depression.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Hippocampal tail volume as a predictive biomarker of antidepressant treatment outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder: a CAN-BIND report.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Article
- The rise and fall of MRI studies in major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2019Review
- Intrinsic Brain Network Biomarkers of Antidepressant Response: a Review.Current psychiatry reports · 2019Review
- Musculoskeletal Pain and Brain Morphology: Oxytocin's Potential as a Treatment for Chronic Pain in Aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLess than 50% of patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) reach symptomatic remission with their initial antidepressant medication (ADM). There are currently no objective measures with which to reliably predict which individuals will achieve remission to ADMs.
methods157 participants with MDD from the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D) underwent baseline MRIs and completed eight weeks of treatment with escitalopram, sertraline or venlafaxine-ER. A score at week 8 of 7 or less on the 17 item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression defined remission. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis using the first 50% participants was performed to define decision trees of baseline MRI volumetric and connectivity (fractional anisotropy) measures that differentiated non-remitters from remitters with maximal sensitivity and specificity. These decision trees were tested for replication in the remaining participants.
findingsOverall, 35% of all participants achieved remission. ROC analyses identified two decision trees that predicted a high probability of non-remission and that were replicated: 1. Left middle frontal volume < 14 · 8 mL & right angular gyrus volume > 6 · 3 mL identified 55% of non-remitters with 85% accuracy; and 2. Fractional anisotropy values in the left cingulum bundle < 0 · 63, right superior fronto-occipital fasciculus < 0 · 54 and right superior longitudinal fasciculus < 0 · 50 identified 15% of the non-remitters with 84% accuracy. All participants who met criteria for both decision trees were correctly identified as non-remitters.
interpretationPretreatment MRI measures seem to reliably identify a subset of patients who do not remit with a first step medication that includes one of these commonly used medications. Findings are consistent with a neuroanatomical basis for non-remission in depressed patients.
fundingBrain Resource Ltd is the sponsor for the iSPOT-D study (NCT00693849).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.