Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26137488›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

Toward a Literature-Driven Definition of Big Data in Healthcare.

Emilie Baro, Samuel Degoul, Régis Beuscart, Emmanuel Chazard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Multivariate Normal Distribution Method for a Virtual Cerebral Arterial Population.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Real World-Big Data Analytics in Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie BaroDepartment of Public Health, EA 2694, University of Lille, 1 Place de Verdun, 59045 Lille Cedex, France.
Samuel DegoulDepartment of Public Health, EA 2694, University of Lille, 1 Place de Verdun, 59045 Lille Cedex, France.
Régis BeuscartDepartment of Public Health, EA 2694, University of Lille, 1 Place de Verdun, 59045 Lille Cedex, France.
Emmanuel ChazardDepartment of Public Health, EA 2694, University of Lille, 1 Place de Verdun, 59045 Lille Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to provide a definition of big data in healthcare.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed literature published until May 9, 2014, was conducted. We noted the number of statistical individuals (n) and the number of variables (p) for all papers describing a dataset. These papers were classified into fields of study. Characteristics attributed to big data by authors were also considered. Based on this analysis, a definition of big data was proposed.

resultsA total of 196 papers were included. Big data can be defined as datasets with Log(n∗p) ≥ 7. Properties of big data are its great variety and high velocity. Big data raises challenges on veracity, on all aspects of the workflow, on extracting meaningful information, and on sharing information. Big data requires new computational methods that optimize data management. Related concepts are data reuse, false knowledge discovery, and privacy issues.

conclusionBig data is defined by volume. Big data should not be confused with data reuse: data can be big without being reused for another purpose, for example, in omics. Inversely, data can be reused without being necessarily big, for example, secondary use of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsPubMedHumansInformation DisseminationPublications

Identifiers

PMID26137488
PMCPMC4468280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.