Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26137446›Full record

ArticleMeta gene2015

Assembly and variation analyses of Clarias batrachus mitogenome retrieved from WGS data and its phylogenetic relationship with other catfishes.

Basdeo Kushwaha, Ravindra Kumar, Suyash Agarwal, Manmohan Pandey, N S Nagpure, Mahender Singh, Shreya Srivastava, C G Joshi, P Das, L Sahoo and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Meta gene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The complete mitochondrial genome of the blackskin catfish (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitochondriomics ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. BAC-FISH Based Physical Map of Endangered CatfishInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Basdeo KushwahaDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ravindra KumarDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Suyash AgarwalDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manmohan PandeyDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
N S NagpureDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mahender SinghDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shreya SrivastavaDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
C G JoshiDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
P DasDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
L SahooDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
P JayasankarDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
P K MeherDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
T M ShahDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
A B PatelDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
Namrata PatelDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
P KoringaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
Sofia Priyadarsani DasDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
Siddhi PatnaikDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
Amrita BitDivision of Fish Genetics & Biotechnology, ICAR- Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar 751002, Odisha, India.
SarikaCentre for Agricultural Bio-informatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Library Avenue, New Delhi 110012, India.
M A IquebalCentre for Agricultural Bio-informatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Library Avenue, New Delhi 110012, India.
Dinesh KumarCentre for Agricultural Bio-informatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Library Avenue, New Delhi 110012, India.
J K JenaDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow 226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) using next generation sequencing technologies paves the way to sequence the mitochondrial genomes with greater ease and lesser time. Here, we used the WGS data of Clarias batrachus, generated from Roche 454 and Ion Torrent sequencing platforms, to assemble the complete mitogenome using both de novo and reference based approaches. Both the methods yielded almost similar results and the best assembled mitogenome was of 16,510 bp size (GenBank Acc. No. KM259918). The mitogenome annotation resulted in 13 coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA genes and one control region, and the gene order was found to be identical with other catfishes. Variation analyses between assembled and the reference (GenBank Acc. No. NC_023923) mitogenome revealed 51 variations. The phylogenetic analysis of coding DNA sequences and tRNA supports the monophyly of catfishes. Two SSRs were identified in C. batrachus mitogenome, out of which one was unique to this species. Based on the relative rate of gene evolution, protein coding mitochondrial genes were found to evolve at a much faster pace than the d-loop, which in turn are followed by the rRNAs; the tRNAs showed wide variability in the rate of sequence evolution, and on average evolve the slowest. Among the coding genes, ND2 evolves most rapidly. The variations present in the coding regions of the mitogenome and their comparative analyses with other catfish species may be useful in species conservation and management programs.

Indexed as

Clarias batrachusIndian catfishMitogenomePhylogeneticsWGS data

Identifiers

PMID26137446
PMCPMC4484717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.