ArticleNew microbes and new infections2015
tcpC as a prospective new virulence marker in blood Escherichia coli isolates from sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of aminoglycoside resistance inIranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- The diet-microbiota axis: a key regulator of intestinal permeability in human health and disease.Tissue barriers · 2023Review
- The relation of phylogroups, serogroups, virulence factors and resistance pattern ofNew microbes and new infections · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of the tcpC in the blood Escherichia coli isolates collected from the sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit was investigated for the first time. The blood and faecal samples were collected from sepsis and nonsepsis patients, respectively. The prevalence of the tcpC and phylogroups was confirmed by gene-specific PCR. The occurrence of the tcpC in the blood E. coli isolates from sepsis patients was significantly higher than the faecal isolates. The higher prevalence of blood E. coli isolates among the pathogenic groups (B2, D) compared to the commensal groups (A, B1) suggests tcpC as a prospective new virulence marker for sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.