ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2015
Diagnostic relevance of autoantibody detection against inhibitors of apoptosis proteins in colon cancer and colon adenoma.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical exploration of marking targeting biopsy in the intraoperative localization value of colon polypectomy.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoantibodies against cancer-related antigens may be detected in the sera of patients with various types of cancer, although their clinical utility has not yet been established. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the diagnostic relevance of autoantibody detection against inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family members in colon cancer, as compared to anti-p53 antibody, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. We established an ELISA system using original recombinant proteins of IAP family members (survivin, livin and X-linked IAP) and measured the expression levels in the sera of 62 healthy donors, 250 patients with colon polyps (adenoma) and 176 patients with colon cancer. When the cutoff value was set as the mean value + 2 standard deviations in healthy donors, anti-survivin exhibited the highest positivity rate (24.4%) among IAP autoantibodies in cancer patients. Furthermore, the anti-survivin antibody exhibited a high positivity rate in early-stage carcinoma and adenoma. In the combination assay, reflecting the significantly high positivity rate of CEA in stage IV tumors, the positivity rate was highest when combining the detection of anti-survivin antibody and CEA in cancer patients (50.0%), indicating that this combination may not be useful for the diagnosis of early-stage cancers. By contrast, reflecting the complete independencE of anti-survivin and anti-p53 antibodies, the combination of detecting these two antibodies resulted in the highest positivity rate (35.6%) in early-stage disease (stage 0-I). These results suggest that the combined measurement of anti-survivin and anti-p53 antibodies may be useful for the detection of early-stage colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.