Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26137199›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2015

Combining metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics to explore novel microbial interactions: towards a systems-level understanding of human microbiome.

Shirley Bikel, Alejandra Valdez-Lara, Fernanda Cornejo-Granados, Karina Rico, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Xavier Soberón, Luis Del Pozo-Yauner, Adrián Ochoa-Leyva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating metagenomics and metatranscriptomics intoThe Journal of general virology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shirley BikelUnidad de Genómica de Poblaciones Aplicada la Salud, Facultad de Química, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F. 14610, Mexico ; Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca C.P. 62210, Mexico.
Alejandra Valdez-LaraUnidad de Genómica de Poblaciones Aplicada la Salud, Facultad de Química, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F. 14610, Mexico ; Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca C.P. 62210, Mexico.
Fernanda Cornejo-GranadosUnidad de Genómica de Poblaciones Aplicada la Salud, Facultad de Química, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F. 14610, Mexico ; Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca C.P. 62210, Mexico.
Karina RicoUnidad de Genómica de Poblaciones Aplicada la Salud, Facultad de Química, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F. 14610, Mexico.
Samuel Canizales-QuinterosUnidad de Genómica de Poblaciones Aplicada la Salud, Facultad de Química, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F. 14610, Mexico.
Xavier SoberónInstituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F., Mexico.
Luis Del Pozo-YaunerInstituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F., Mexico.
Adrián Ochoa-LeyvaUnidad de Genómica de Poblaciones Aplicada la Salud, Facultad de Química, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México, D.F. 14610, Mexico ; Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Avenida Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca C.P. 62210, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advances in experimental methods and the development of high performance bioinformatic tools have substantially improved our understanding of microbial communities associated with human niches. Many studies have documented that changes in microbial abundance and composition of the human microbiome is associated with human health and diseased state. The majority of research on human microbiome is typically focused in the analysis of one level of biological information, i.e., metagenomics or metatranscriptomics. In this review, we describe some of the different experimental and bioinformatic strategies applied to analyze the 16S rRNA gene profiling and shotgun sequencing data of the human microbiome. We also discuss how some of the recent insights in the combination of metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics can provide more detailed description on the interactions between microorganisms and viruses in oral and gut microbiomes. Recent studies on viromics have begun to gain importance due to the potential involvement of viruses in microbial dysbiosis. In addition, metatranscriptomic combined with metagenomic analysis have shown that a substantial fraction of microbial transcripts can be differentially regulated relative to their microbial genomic abundances. Thus, understanding the molecular interactions in the microbiome using the combination of metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics is one of the main challenges towards a system level understanding of human microbiome.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsHuman microbiomeMetagenomicsMetatranscriptomicsSystems-levelViromics

Identifiers

PMID26137199
PMCPMC4484546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.