ArticleOncology letters2015
Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Ki-67 in Patients With Resected Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Phase II Study of Docetaxel and Pembrolizumab plus Interleukin 12 Gene Therapy in Nonmetastatic, Anthracycline-Refractory Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (INTEGRAL).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.International journal of general medicine · 2022Review
- Postmastectomy radiotherapy reduces locoregional and disease recurrence in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Eribulin upregulates miR-195 expression and downregulates Wnt3a expression in non-basal-like type of triple-negative breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231.Human cell · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological complete response (pCR) and survival rate in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to conduct a search of the available databases, in order to find studies performed between January 2006 and January 2014. The bibliographies of the included studies were examined with the same criteria. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group framework was used to evaluate the included studies, and RevMan 5.1 and GRADEprofiler 3.6 were used to analyze the extracted data. A total of 19 studies with 6,180 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the pCR rates in patients with TNBC were significantly higher than those in patients with non-TNBC. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly lower in the patients with TNBC compared with those with non-TNBC. Furthermore, these survival rates were significantly higher in the patients with TNBC who achieved a pCR compared with those in the patients who did not achieve a pCR. pCR rates were higher among the patients with TNBC with high Ki-67 expression than among those with low Ki-67 expression. The patients with TNBC exhibited lower survival rates compared with those with non-TNBC, but achieved higher pCR rates. Moreover, those patients achieving a pCR exhibited improved 5-year survival rates, suggesting that the pCR rate could be predictive of survival in patients with TNBC. In addition, high Ki-67 expression may predict the likelihood of a pCR. However, future multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to enhance the quantity and quality of the clinical evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.