ArticleOncology letters2015
Reduced administration of rasburicase for tumor lysis syndrome: A single-institution experience.
Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, the dosage and duration of rasburicase administration were retrospectively evaluated for the ability to control the serum uric acid (S-UA) level in 13 patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), or those at risk of developing TLS, at the University of Fukui Hospital. At the time of diagnosis, seven patients already exhibited laboratory TLS, and three demonstrated clinical TLS. All patients received rasburicase in addition to chemotherapy agents. The median dose was 0.19 mg/kg (range, 0.13-0.25 mg/kg), and the median duration was four days (range, 1-7 days). Six patients sequentially received a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol or febuxostat. The primary estimate was the normalization of the S-UA level at the end of rasburicase treatment and on treatment day seven. The average S-UA level prior to treatment was 10.4±4.5 mg/dl (mean ±standard deviation), and 11 out of 13 patients demonstrated a S-UA level >7 mg/dl. The S-UA level at the end of rasburicase administration was 0.5±1.5 mg/dl and the S-UA level at day seven was 1.4±1.5 mg/dl. All the patients achieved normalization of the S-UA level. On day seven subsequent to the initiation of treatment, the patients receiving rasburicase for a maximum of three days exhibited an S-UA level of 1.9±1.8 mg/dl, while the patients receiving rasburicase for longer than three days demonstrated an S-UA level of 1.0±1.3 mg/dl (P=0.20; Mann-Whitney test). The administration of 0.13 mg/kg and 0.22 mg/kg resulted in comparable UA level reductions. The administration of allopurinol or febuxostat following rasburicase administration suppressed the re-increase in S-UA level. Therefore, it was concluded that reduced administration of rasburicase successfully controlled the S-UA level in TLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.