Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26136816›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2015

Microbial colonization of open abdomen in critically ill surgical patients.

Suvi Kaarina Rasilainen, Mentula Panu Juhani, Leppäniemi Ari Kalevi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Laparostoma-Avoidance and treatment of complications].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Open Abdomen Management andGastroenterology research and practice · 2017
    Article
  7. The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suvi Kaarina RasilainenDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Jorvi Hospital, Turuntie, 150 Espoo, Finland.
Mentula Panu JuhaniDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Leppäniemi Ari KaleviDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIJorvi Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study was designed to describe the time-course and microbiology of colonization of open abdomen in critically ill surgical patients and to study its association with morbidity, mortality and specific complications of open abdomen. A retrospective cohort analysis was done.

methodsOne hundred eleven consecutive patients undergoing vacuum-assisted closure with mesh as temporary abdominal closure method for open abdomen were analyzed. Microbiological samples from the open abdomen were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Mann-Whitney U test was used when comparing number of temporary abdominal closure changes between colonized and sterile patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done to calculate cumulative estimates for colonization. Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze risk factors for colonization.

resultsMicrobiological samples were obtained from 97 patients. Of these 76 (78 %) were positive. Sixty-one (80 %) patients were colonized with multiple micro-organisms and 27 (36 %) were cultured positive for candida species. The duration of open abdomen treatment adversely affected the colonization rate. Thirty-three (34 %) patients were colonized at the time of laparostomy. After one week of open abdomen treatment 69, and after two weeks 76 patients were colonized with cumulative colonization estimates of 74 % and 89 %, respectively. Primary fascial closure rate was 80 % (61/76) and 86 % (18/21) for the colonized and sterile patients, respectively. The rate of wound complications did not significantly differ between these groups.

conclusionsMicrobial colonization of open abdomen is associated with the duration of open abdomen treatment. Wound complications are common after open abdomen, but colonization does not seem to have significant effect on these. The high colonization rate described herein should be taken into account when primarily sterile conditions like acute pancreatitis and aortic aneurysmal rupture are treated with open abdomen.

Indexed as

LaparostomyMicrobial colonizationOpen abdomenTemporary abdominal closure

Identifiers

PMID26136816
PMCPMC4487573
OpenAlexW2168667656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.